Advanced Search Results
A.D. Jayaveerapandia Nadar and Co. and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Chennai
Jan-24-1975
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(23), 2(31) and 277; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4
[1975]101ITR390(Mad)
T.V. Ramanathan, Adv.
Krishnaswamy Reddy, J.1. The appellants in C.As. Nos. 466 and 481 of 1972 are accused 1, A.D. Jayaveera Pandia Nadar and Company, accused 2, A.D. Jawaharlal Pandian, and accused 3, A.D. Jayaveera Pandia Nadar in C.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.K.M. Govindaswamy Chettiar (Decd.) and ors. (Through Legal Represent ...
Chennai
Apr-30-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68 and 148
(1998)148CTR(Mad)458; [2000]244ITR559(Mad)
T.V. Ramanathan, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The assessee, A. K. M. Govindaswamy Chettiar, Dindigul, was an individual and a resident in India. He died during the course of reference proceedings and his legal representatives were brought on record....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakinabai Ibrahim and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
Jul-27-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)154CTR(Mad)509
T.V. Ramanathan, for the Assessee. Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, to the Revenue.
Subbulakshmy, J.In pursuance of the directions of this court, the Tribunal has referred the following two questions of law for the opinion of this court:'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late Shree E.M. Gopalakrishna ...
Chennai
Aug-10-1979
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 10, 12, 46(1) and 65; Constitution of India - Article 134A
(1980)16CTR(Mad)297; [1981]129ITR738(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Sethuraman, J.1. The Appellate Tribunal has referred, under Section 64(1) of the E.D. Act, 1953, the following question at the instance of the Controller of Estate Duty:'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.V. Ramanathan, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Exide ...
Jharkhand
Oct-19-2007
Criminal
[2008(1)JCR167(Jhr)]
ORDERD.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the entire criminal proceeding initiated against them including the order dated 5.4.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKutty Flush Doors and Furniture Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the State of Tamil N ...
Chennai
Apr-15-1982
Sales Tax
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 32
[1984]57STC74(Mad)
T.V. Ramanathan, Adv.
Balasubrahmanyan, J. 1. In this revision filed by a sales tax assessee, the question raised is about the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner to use his special powers of revision to revise the assessee's Central sales...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.M. Ramanathan Chettiar and anr. Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Chennai
Jul-30-1973
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Rules, 1953 - Rule 7; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 21(1) and 85; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14
[1975]99ITR410(Mad)
S. Narayanaswami and ;T.V. Ramanathan, Advs.
Ramanujam, J. 1. These two references arise out of the estate duty assessment of the estate of one K. V. AL. RM. RM. Ramanathan Chettiar, hereinafter referred to as the deceased. The deceased was domiciled in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Madras Advocates' Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. the Joint Commerci ...
Chennai
Feb-11-1971
Sales Tax
(1971)IIMLJ77; [1971]28STC224(Mad)
S. Narayanaswamy and ;T.V. Ramanathan, Advs.
ORDERRamaprasada Rao, J. 1. The petitioner is a co-operative society registered under the Madras Co-operative Societies Act. The membership of the society is restricted to Advocates practising in the city of Madras. One of the objects...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMallika Battery Service Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Royapettah ...
Chennai
Aug-12-1971
Sales Tax
[1972]29STC583(Mad)
S. Narayanaswami and ; T.V. Ramanathan, Advs.
ORDERRamaprasada Rao, J. 1. In these three writ petitions, the petitioner is questioning the action of the respondent in having issued three independent notices for three assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64 and 1964-65 calling upon the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanalakshmi and Co. Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
May-02-1973
Sales Tax
[1974]34STC186(Mad)
T.V. Ramanathan, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. The disputed turnovers in this case are (1) a sum of Rs. 1,10,836.95 said to represent the sale price of the forest produce and (2) a sum of Rs. 37,314.05 said to be the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »