Advanced Search Results
A. Geetha Vs. G. Sankaran and anr.
Chennai
Dec-07-2000
Tenancy
(2001)1MLJ390
ORDERP. Thangavel, J.1. These civil revision petitions have been filed by the landlords/ landlady, against the common judgment and decree, dated 27.2.1998 and made in R.C.A.Nos. 10 to 13 of 1995 on the file of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Shanmugham Chetty Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Dec-14-1983
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(1)
[1985]154ITR331(Mad)
T.S. Ramu, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. The assessee in this case is an individual and the original assessment for the year 1965-66 was completed on October 8, 1965, computing the total income as Rs. 8,990, the source of income being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Feb-06-1985
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B, 35B(1), 251, 254 and 263
(1986)53CTR(Mad)104; [1986]157ITR112(Mad)
T.S. Ramu, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. In this petition filed under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the assessee seeks a reference to this court on the following questions : ' (i) Whether, on the facts and in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Balakrishna Brick Works Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Oct-22-1981
Sales Tax
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 6
[1982]49STC251(Mad)
T.S. Ramu, Adv.
Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. The assessee in this case carries on the business of manufacture and supply of bricks from his kiln. For the assessment year 1974-75 the assessee was assessed to sales tax. The turnover determined by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Srinivasan (Deceased) (by Legal Representatives) Vs. Commissioner o ...
Chennai
Oct-01-1974
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147
[1975]101ITR94(Mad)
S. Narayanaswami and ;T.S. Ramu, Advs.
Ramaswami, J.1. The assessee is the managing director of a private limited company called Anjaneya Motor Transports (Private) Ltd., Erode. The assessment for the previous year ending on September 30, 1961, relevant to the accounting year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuttiammal (Deceased) (by L.R.) Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Chennai
Mar-13-1978
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 10
[1979]119ITR740(Mad)
T.S. Ramu, Adv.
Varadarajan J.1. The questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras ' B ' Bench, for the opinion of this court at the instance of the revenue and the assessee are the following :'(1) Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Srinivasan by L. Rs. Shanbagammal and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...
Chennai
Oct-16-1973
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(3)
[1976]105ITR315(Mad)
S. Narayanaswamy, ;T.V. Ramanathan and ;T.S. Ramu, Advs.
1. The assessee is a partner in a firm called Anjaneya Motor Transport along with his wife and another stranger. His two minor sons, Murali and Mohan, were admitted to the benefits of the partnership even...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonoranjan Ganguli and Sons (P.) Ltd. Vs. Secretary to Government, Fin ...
Chennai
Mar-17-1975
Sales Tax
[1976]37STC549(Mad)
S. Narayanaswami and ;T.S. Ramu, Advs.
V. Ramaswami, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 41 of the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act (Act No. 6 of 1967), against the order of the Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Pondicherry, made under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Venkatasubramaniam and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Jul-19-1972
Direct Taxation
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)
[1973]91ITR220(Mad)
S. Narayanaswamy, ;T.S. Ramu and ;R. Srinivasan, Advs.
Ramaswami, J. 1. The following question has been referred under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for decision:' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to development...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Hilal Vs. Appellate Controller of Estate Duty and anr.
Chennai
Mar-13-1979
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 9 and 60(1)
[1979]120ITR61(Mad)
T.S. Ramu, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order of the first respondent (Appellate Controller of Estate Duty, Southern Zone,Madras) dated 31st March, 1975, levying a penalty of Rs. 34,000 under Section 60(1)(c) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »