Advanced Search Results

Govardhan Das Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2 and 15(3)

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR294]; (2003)ILLJ35MP

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Bhatia, Adv.

A.M. Sapre, J. 1. The decision rendered in this writ shall govern the disposal of other connected writs eingW.PNos. 2072, 2073, 2074, 2075, 2076 and 2077 of 2001, as these petitions involve common questions of law...

Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. Delhi Ex-servicemen Stone Crushing Co. and or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)132; 52(1993)DLT432

Advocate for Appellant : Amar Gupta, Adv

Sat Pal, J. (1) This is a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,09,185.45with pendent lite and future interest @ 20% per annum with quarterlyrests.(2) The facts of the case briefly stated are that the plaintiff is...

D.N. Gupta Vs. Jaswant Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi250; 21(1982)DLT8; 1982(3)DRJ1; ILR1982Delhi309; 1982RLR185

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Nasimhan,; R.K. Makhija,; H.L. Sabarwal,;

Saltan Singh, J.(1) This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against the judgment and order of the Rent Controller dated 30th September,...

Mrs. Neena Vs. John Pormer

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1985MP85

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Bhatia, Adv.

Sohani, J.1. This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce. Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), made by the learned IVth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Indore, for...

Espn Software India Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Wire and Wireless India ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioners: Mr. N. Ganpathy, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr.T.S. Bhatia, Advocate.

S.B. Sinha These two petitions being inter-related were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. The parties hereto had...

M/S R.K. Cable Vs. Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : For Appellant: Mr.T. S. Bhatia, Advocate. For Respondent: Mr.Amit Chadha, Senior Advocate with Gaurav Juneja and Mr. Praveen Pahuja, Advocates.

S.B. Sinha The petitioner herein is a Multi Service operator. It has a control room for transmission of signals of the channels of various broadcasters for which it has obtained a registration certificate from the Post...

Shri. Hari Ram Anthala Vs. United Commercial Bank (Uco)

Court : Central Information Commission CIC

Subject : Right to Information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Old JNU Campus, Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067 Tel: + 91 11 26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001217/SG/15146 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001217/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Hari Ram Anthala,...

Taramati Nandkishore Sharma Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rule 22 and 22(1); Central Government, Ministry of Defence and Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 25 and 28; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Regulations - Regulation 71

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ159

Advocate for Appellant : Majid Darbari, Adv.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of connected petitions M.P. No. 1078/93 - Smt. Prabha Rathore v. The Cantonment Board and another; M.P. No. 1365/93 - Mrs. R. Amit v. The Cantonment...

Dr. S. Dutt Vs. the Visitor of the University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi University Act, 1922 - Sections 7A(7) and 45; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1963P& H331

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Narula and; J.K. Sethi, Advs.

Grover, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which has been referred to a larger Bench in view of the nature of the points canvassed.2. In 1944 the petitioner was...

Electra (Jaipur) Ltd. Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR517(P& H)

Hemant Gupta, J.1. The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial court, whereby an application filed by the petitioner for removal of Shri B.K. Saini, as an arbitrator...