Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: t ravikumar · Page 1 of about 1,238 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 27 2002

Cwt Vs. Gnanagiri Ganesan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-27-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]260ITR161(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, for the Revenue None appeared, for the Assessee.

N. V. Balasubramanian, J.In pursuance of the directions of this court, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following questions of law for our consideration :'1. Whether, on the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Cit Vs. Electro Alloy Special Steel Castings (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]128TAXMAN666(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar for the Applicant.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J. The counsel for the respondent was absent on 4-12-2002. Today also the counsel for the respondent is not present. However, since the respondent has been served, we proceed to dispose of the matter....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2002

Cit Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Finance Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]127TAXMAN392(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, for the Revenue R. Kumar and T.N. Seetharaman, for the Assessee

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.The question of law referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for our consideration under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in relation to the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1980-81 reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 2002

Cit Vs. Asoka Betelnut Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]127TAXMAN331(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, for the Revenue R. Meenakshi Sundaram, for the Assessee.

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.T.C. 83 of 1998 is a reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax with reference to the assessment year 1988-89 of the assessee. The question of law referred by the Income Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. P. Sekar Trust and Peegee Trust

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-15-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5, 21, 64(5), 148, 160 to 166 and 245S; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 40 and 41; Musalman Wakf Validity Act, 1913; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 13

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Mad)390

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, Standing Counsel

K. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. All these 15 appeals are filed at the instance of the revenue against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 24.02.2004 made in I.T.As. Nos. 2023...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2000

Balakrishna Pillai Vs. Balachandran

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-29-2000

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 16 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215

Reported in : 2001CriLJ846

Advocate for Appellant : T.V. Prabhakaran,; T. Ravikumar and; S. Rajeev, Advs

S. Sankarasubban, J.1. Petitioner in this contempt case, R. Balakrishna Pillai, is a former Minister and is a Member of Kerala Legislative Assembly. He is an accused in C.C. No. 2/1989 on the file of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2001

Jose Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-15-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1), 133(1), 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 341, 354, 427, 452 and 506(1); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and (2); Panchayat Raj Act; Explosives Act; Minor Metals and Minerals Excavation Act; Minor Metals and Minerals Excavation Rules

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4902

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar and; George Mecheril, Advs.

G. Sivarajan, J.1. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 5 in Crime No. 215 of 2000 of the Sreekandapuram Police Station for offences Punishable under Ss. 143, 147, 148, 452, 324, 326, 427 read with S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1997

Commissioner, Kovilpatti Muncipality, Kovilpatti Vs. Tamilarasan and 3 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-14-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1999ACJ876; 1997(2)CTC449; (1998)IIIMLJ342

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The appellant in this appeal was the respondent in W.C. No. 63 of 1987 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour for the Workmen Compensation, Tirunelveli. The respondents herein are the petitioners in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2002

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Asoka Betelnut Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957; ;Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40 and 40(3)

Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Mad)178

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, Junior Standing Counsel in T.C. No. 83/98 and ;R. Meenakshi Sundaram, Adv. in T.C. No. 230 of 1998

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. T.C. 83 of 1998 is a reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth Tax with reference to the assessment year 1988-89 of the assessee. The question of law referred by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Electro Alloy Special Steel Castings (P ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : CivilDirect Taxation

Acts : Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Propvisions) Act, 1986; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH and 254(2)

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Mad)521; [2003]264ITR97(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The counsel for the respondent was absent on 4th Dec., 2002. Today also the counsel for the respondent is not present. However, since the respondent has been served, we proceed to dispose of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial