Advanced Search Results

Mohanram Sastry and Others Vs. Swadharma Swarajya Sangha and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25, 108, 155, 255, 256, 286, 397 and 398

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas272(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T. Raghavan

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. The facts of the case in both the petitions are as follows : Company Petition No. 12 of 1982, has been filed under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter...

V.G. Balasundaram and Others Vs. New theatres Carnatic Talkies Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155, 166, 169, 170(2), 173, 173(1), 189, 189(2), 192, 193, 195, 210, 284, 285, 298, 397, 398, 399, 402, 406, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543 and 544

Reported in : [1993]77CompCas324(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Adv.

Lakshmanan, J. 1. The first respondent company is a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. Respondents Nos. 2 to 6 are brothers and son of one Balaswamy Naidu. The...

In Re: Asian Investments Ltd. and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 42, 77, 81, 94, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 391 and 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas517(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Adv. and ;A.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, ;Adv. for the Regional Director of Company Affairs, Madras

Lakshmanan, J.1. These petitions were filed by the transferors and transferee-companies to sanction a scheme of amalgamation whereby the petitioner-company in Company petitions Nos. 50, 51 and 53 of 1991 (hereinafter called 'transferor-companies'), would get merged...

Mrs. E.V. Swaminathan Vs. K.M.M.A. Industries and Roadways Private Ltd ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108, 111, 116, 116(3), 153(3), 155, 155(3), 193, 194 and 195; Companies (Court) Rules - 1959, Rules 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas1(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Senior Adv. and ;A.K. Mayilsamy, Adv.

Lakshmanan, J.1. The petitioner has filed the above company petition under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act 1 of 1956), with the following prayers : (a) to rectify the register of members of the...

Nanak Chand ShaduraIn Vs. the Tinnelvely-tuticorIn Electric Supply Co. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28 and 72; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 21

Reported in : AIR1975Mad103; MANU/TN/0162/1975

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan and ;T.K. Seshadri, Advs.

Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The defendant in O. S. No. 26 of 1966 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, is the appellant. The plaintiff-respondent filed the suit alleging that it paid in...

Sath Nanak Chand Shandurain, Manufacturers, Importers and Stockists Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1974)2MLJ431

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T. Raghavan

T. Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The defendant in O.S. No. 21 of 1966 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate judge, Tuticorin, is the appellant. The plaintiff respondent filed the suit alleging that it paid...

H.P.A. International and ors. Vs. State Bank of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 8 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34 - Order 1, Rule 10(5) - Order 6, Rule 8A - Order 8A; Indian Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Original Side Rules - Order 5 and 5A

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas682(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Adv.

J. Kanakaraj, J. 1. Defendants Nos. 1 to 6 in C. S. No. 338 of 1981 are the appellants in both the appeals. The first respondent, State Bank of India, filed the suit, C. S. No....

Auditor Dasaradha Rami Reddy Charities Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 11(5), 12, 12A, 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 80G

Reported in : (1989)76CTR(Mad)124; [1989]177ITR249(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Adv.

Ratnam, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition is a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, as S.L. No. 357 of 1985 and the objects of the society are purely charitable in...

P.K. Chinnasamy Vs. Superintending Engineers, Execution Circle, Madura ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15, 16, 17 and 30

Reported in : AIR1990Mad347

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan and ;V. Ramakrishnan, Advs.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J. 1. The four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and the two Revisions require a common disposal, because they arise out of a common judgment of the Court below, though in four different proceedings. There were...

M. Senthil Kumar and anr. Vs. Sudha Mills (India) Private Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 433 and 443(2)

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas1029(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan and ;A.K. Mylsamy, Advs. and ;Arvind P. Datar and ;R. Venkatavaradhan, Advs.

Jayasimha Babu, J.1. Equal partners who founded a private limited company, Sudha Mills (India) Private Limited on February 2, 1990, with equal shareholding and equal number of seats on the board of directors, after achieving impressive...