Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: t r mani · Page 1 of about 148 results (0.261 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 2003

C.S. Robert and A.S. Arokiaraj, Trustees and Representatives of Cathol ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2003

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Trust Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ254

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Srinivasan, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The question regarding administration of a church, to be precise, a Catholic Church, by name, St. Mary Magdalin Church situate in a village called, Vakkampatti in Dindigul taluk is the subject matter of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2005

Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 108; ;Indian Trusts Act; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80, 80(2), 92, 104(1) - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Hindu law

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ149

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Duraiswamy, Adv. for Appellant No. 2 in A.S. No. 851 of 1989, ;V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv. for Appellant (died) No. 1 in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 and ;S.V. Jayaraman, Sr. Counsel

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. An interesting question of law arises in the appeal in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 regarding the character of the Will left by one Palaniappa Chettiar (testator) and his wife Chinnammal @ Rangammal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2002

D.S. Rajagopalan, Vs. A. Mohammad Ali

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-23-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ199

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;T.M. Hariharan, Adv.

1. Defendants in O.S.No.1/1997 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur, are the appellants in the second appeal. The respondent herein filed the suit for a preliminary decree, directing the defendants to pay a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2006

Nalli Sambasivam and Smt. Nalli Duraiswamy Saroja Vs. the Deputy Regis ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 21 and 21(1); Trade Marks Act, 1940; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules - Rule 51(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 38; Central Excise Rules; Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : LC2007(1)210; 2007(34)PTC553(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;T.M. Hariharan, Adv.

V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. These appeals arise out of a common order passed by the learned Judge in T.M.A. No. 7 & 8 of 1993, upholding the orders of the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1999

Dr. Ramarao Vs. the Divisional Engineer (Telegraphs) Telegraphs Office ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1999

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 80; Indian Telelgraph Rules, 1951 -- Rules 24 and 445

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC290

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;T.M. Hariharan

ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 525 of 1985 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi, who had lost the suit claim before the two Courts below is the appellant. The suit out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2000

Sundaram Nadar Vs. Sukumaran

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Benami Transaction Prohibition Act, 1988 -- Sections 3 and 4(2); Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101 to 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 100; Indian Trust Act, 1882; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC473

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. T.M. Hariharan, Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.11 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kuzhithurai, is the appellant in the second appeal. 2. The parties are father and son. The suit was filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2000

L.S. Mariappan, 205 Dindigul Road, Madurai-1 Vs. Kuppamuthu and 6 Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-09-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC405

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan, ;Mr. S.T. Srinivasa Raghavan, Advs.

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. One L. Palanichami Chettiar and his wife Kaveri Ammal had two sons by name L.P. Lakshmanan Chettiar and P. Shanmugam alias Palani Chami Chettiar. Thiru L.P. Lakshmanan Chettiar had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1988

State Bank of India Vs. N. Sathiah and Etc.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-07-1988

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 176

Reported in : AIR1989Mad279

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Adv.

Sathiadev, J.1. These appeals are preferred by Stale Bank of India, ArantangiBranch against the judgments in O.S. Nos. 9,10, 12 and 11 of 1978 on the file of Sub-Court,Pudukottal. The said suits were filed forrecovery of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

K. Mohamed Muthu and ors. Vs. Mrs. Habeeba Beebi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Muslim Law

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC721; (2004)3MLJ84

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani Senior Counsel for ;T.R. Rajaraman, Adv.

K. Govindarajan, J.1. Defendants 1 to 8 who succeeded before the trial Court and suffered decree in A.S.No. 277/1987, filed the above Appeal.2. The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.527/1982 on the file of the Sub-Court,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

Perumal Vs. Boyot Selvacarassou, Power Agent Boyot Virappin

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Pondicherry Civil Courts Act - Sections 9(2); Pondicherry Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1986

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ150

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;P.A. Deivasigamani SP.L. Palaniappa

Prabha Sridevan, J.1. The preliminary issue regarding jurisdiction is raised in this appeal and that issue as well as other issues that arise will be dealt with. 2. According to the respondent / plaintiff, the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial