Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: t m krishnaswami iyer · Page 1 of about 51 results (0.130 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 1960

A. Ramachandran Vs. A. Alagiriswami, Govt. Pleader High Court, Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123

Reported in : AIR1961Mad450

Advocate for Appellant : G. Vasantha Pai and ;D. Padmanabha Pai, Advs.;T.M. Krishnaswami Iyer and ;T.T. Gopalakrishnan, Advs.;S. Chellaswamy, Adv.

1. By a notification dated 22-6-1960 and bearing S. R. O. No. A. 4436 of 1960 issued in the Public Department, the Government of Madras appointed Mr. Alagiriswami, to be Government Pleader with effect from 1-7-1960...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1950

Venkatarama Naicker Vs. Ramasami Naicker and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 9, 34, 53 and 54; Debt Law; Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1952Mad504a; (1951)IIMLJ32

Advocate for Appellant : T.M. Krishnaswami Iyer and ;M. Murugappa Chettiar, Advs.

ORDER1. This is a revision petition under Section 75 of the Provincial insolvency Act, by one Venkatarama Naicker, hereinafter called the opposing creditor, against the judgment & decree of the Dist. J. of Tirunelveli in C.M.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1963

R.P. David Vs. M. Thiagarajan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-1963

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1922 - Sections 14, 47, 75 and 75(2); Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 27 and 29; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1966Mad89

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T. M. Krishnaswami Iyer

ORDER1. These revision petitions arise out of proceedings under the Indian Lunacy Act 1922, before the District Court, Salem. The petitioner is the same in both the petitions. The first respondent in C.R.P. 1634 of 1962...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 07 1962

Velayuthan Pillai Neelakanta Vs. Mathavan Pillai Mathevan Pillai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-07-1962

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 148; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1963Mad226; (1963)IMLJ133

Advocate for Appellant : T.M. Krishnaswami Iyer and ;A. Balasubramaniam, Advs.

Anantanarayanan, J.1. This appeal involves a question of some interest which could be tersely stated in the following form, namely, whether a subsequent suit for redemption of a mortgage would be barred by limitation or application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1959

N. Ramaswami Mudaliar Vs. S.A. Aiyasami Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-1959

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 92; Copyright Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 539; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1960Mad467

Ramaswami, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge of Salem in O. S. No. 165 of 1954.(2) The suit out of which this appeal arises was for (a)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1933

Palaniappa Chetty and ors. Vs. M.P.N.Rm. Raman Chetty and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-21-1933

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1934Mad183

Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. The suit relates to a plot of land known as the Thattan Punja. There were two brothers, Sevuga and Muthuvadugu. The plaintiffs' predecessors, in-interest purchased Muthuvadugu's interest in the plot, under a sale-deed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1934

Kailasanath Mudaliar Vs. Parasakthi Vadivanni

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-1934

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 159Ind.Cas.845

Varadachariar, J.1. This is an appeal by plaintiff No. 3--the husband and legal representative of plaintiff No. 1--and relates only to a portion of the subject-matter of the suit. The plaint was presented only by two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1958

Elias Saleh Mohamed Sait and ors. Vs. Khanmull and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-19-1958

Subject : ContractCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 3 - Order 34, Rules 2, 4 and 11; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 19A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Debt Laws; Mysore Money Lenders Act, 1939 - Sections 2(3), 2(9), 14, 15, 16 and 17; Mysore Usurious Loans Act, 1923 - Sections 3; Sonthal Parganas Settlement Regulations - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1959Kant102; AIR1959Mys102; ILR1958KAR724; (1958)36MysLJ868

Advocate for Appellant : Haneef, Adv. in R.A. No. 154/52-53, ;T. Krishna Rao, Adv. for ;K. Raja Iyer, Adv. and ;M.V. Sreenivasa Iyengar, Adv. in R.A. No. 196/52-53 and ;T.M. Krishnaswami Aiyar, Adv.

K. S. Hegde, J. 1. These arc connected appeals. They arise out of the decree and judgment of the learned District Judge, Civil Station, Bangalore, in O. S. No. 59 of 1949-50.2. Appellants in Regular Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1923

Kondal Rayal Reddiar Vs. Ranganayaki Ammal Alias Amirthammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-1923

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1923)45MLJ186

1. This is an appeal by the husband against the decree of the District Judge of South Arcot, dismissing his suit for restitution of conjugal rights against the 1st defendant, his wife, on the ground that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1930

Ramaswami Chettiar Vs. P.M.A. Vellayappa Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-17-1930

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 131Ind.Cas.643

Eddy, J.1. It is a tribute to the learned Counsel who have appeared before me that my mind has fluctuated a good deal during the course of their arguments. Rightly or wrongly my mind is now...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial