Advanced Search Results

In Re: G.V. Films Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 2(12), 75, 78, 78(1), 78(2), 94 to 97, 100 to 105, 217(1), 235 to 251, 390 to 394 and 643; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 47 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas415(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Adv. for ;Rugan and ;Arya, Advs. in C.P. Nos. 96 to 98 of 2008 and ;Arvind P. Datar and ;R. Venkatavaradan, Advs. in C.A. Nos. 1177 and 1178 of 2008;T.K. Seshadri and ;T.K. Bhaskar, Advs.;

Chitra Venkataraman, J.1. GV Films Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 'demerged company', is the petitioner in C.P. No. 96 of 2008 ; GV Studio City Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as 'first resulting company'), is the petitioner...

T. Balan Vs. Unicentre Agencies and Engg. (P.) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : R. Varadarajan for the Petitioner. T.K. Seshadri for the Respondent. A.V.K. Ezhilmani and R. Harishankar for Proposed Party.

1. The petitioners collectively holding 50 per cent of the issued and paid up capital of M/s. Unicentre Agencies and Engineering Private Limited (“the Company”) aggrieved on account of certain acts of oppression and mis-management in...

Shri T.O. Aleyas, Shri Bobby Vs. St. Mary'S Hotels Private Limited

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. T.K. Seshadri

1. The petition in C.P.30/2003 ("first petition") is filed by the petitioners collectively holding more than 10 percent of the paid up capital of M/s St. Mary's Hotels Private Limited ("SMHPL") under Sections 397, 398, 402...

Consolidated Agencies a Partnership Firm Rep. by Its Partner A.L. Laks ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR2002Mad396; (2002)2MLJ56

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The appeal is directed against the order dated 29.3.2001 made in Application No.3713 of 1998 in C.S.No.87 of 1998 revoking the leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent to the plaintiff/appellant...

idbi Bank Limited Vs. the Administrator Kothari Orient Finance Limited ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 293, 293(1), 431, 441, 446(2), 531 and 531(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A and 54

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas282(Mad); (2009)8MLJ209

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Seshadri, Sr. Adv. for ;Shivakumar and ;Suresh, Advs.

M. Chockalingam, J.1. This appeal challenges an order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in Company Application No. 1208 of 2002 an application seeking a direction to the respondents to execute and register...

Beml Ltd. Vs. Beml Midwest Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Chennai

Subject : Company

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Naganand, S. Sriranga, Gupta and Ravi, R. Murari, Ms. Kavitha Kannan, T.K. Seshadri and N. Sakthivel for the Appearing Parties.

1. The petitioner has invoked the equitable jurisdiction of the Company Law Board under sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) with a view to bringing to an end...

Smt. Lakshmi Natarajan Vs. Bharatan Publications Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)94CompCas367

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. T. K. Seshadri

1. This is a petition filed under Section 111(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), praying for declaration that the transfer of 240 equity shares bearing distinctive Nos. 1242 to 1301,...

Enfield India Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(15), 3, 3(1), 12, 12(1) and 25; ;Central Excises Act; Indian Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1988(17)ECC156; 1988(19)LC116(Madras)

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. These Writ Petitions coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof the order of the High Court, dated 4-6-1981 and made herein and the...

Andhra Civil Construction Company Vs. Cegat

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1994LC145(Madras); 1992(58)ELT184(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioners challenge an order dated 31-10-1980 passed on the application for waiver of predeposit of a duty of Rs. 14,58,530.46 p. and a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh levied on them by the Collector...

R. Sivashanmugam and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Second Amendment Act, 1994 - Sections 4 to 6; Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 11, 21A, 22, 22(1) and 22(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23A; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Articles 31B, 39 and 371D

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ289

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sivaji, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 19088 of 1997, 4083 of 1999 and 18339 of 2000, ;C.V. Vijayakumar, Adv. for T.R. Rajaraman, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 17115 of 1997 and 10192 of 1998 and ;T.K. Seshadri, SC for M.S

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. In these writ petitions, the challenge is to the amendment brought in by the Tamil Nadu Act 11 of 1996 to the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Second Amendment...