Advanced Search Results
The State of Maharashtra Vs. Babu @ Babusya Vithal Rathod and Others
Mumbai
Apr-17-1998
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 392, 396 and 397; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 59, 106 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 35, 161, 313, 354(3), 366 and 367
1998(5)BomCR863
T.E. Mane, Adv.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both the matters arise out of the same set of facts and a common judgment we are disposing them off together.2. Vide judgment and order dated 11th December, 1996, passed in Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunkappa Nagappa Pujari Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-19-1994
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32, 60, 61, 106 and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
1995(2)BomCR665
T.E. Mane, Adv.,
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 29-6-1993, passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Session Case No. 56 of 1993, convicting and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanna Nigonda Hattali and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-10-1995
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 323, 325, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313
1995CriLJ4034
Adik Shirodkar and ;V.M. Thorat, Advs.;T.E. Mane, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Vide judgment and order dated 24-8-1993 passed in Sessions Case No. 54 of 1992, the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, convicted and sentenced the appellants in the manner stated hereinafter :(i) Basanna...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Saraswati Shivanand Kumbhar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-12-2003
CriminalFamily
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302
II(2004)DMC32
T.E. Mane, Adv. for Appellant No. 1 and ;Rahul S. Kate, Adv. for Appellant No. 2
J.N. Patel, J.1. Heard Mr. T.E. Mane, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-accused No. 1, Mr. Rahul S. Kate, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-accused No. 2 and Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, the learned A.P.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Anjayya Falmari and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-28-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 60, 61, 101 and 102; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
1995(1)BomCR116; (1994)96BOMLR144
T.E. Mane, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. This appeal is directed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 22-12-1987 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 90 of 1987, convicting and sentencing them...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisan Bhanudas Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-13-1994
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 60 and 61; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304II
1995(1)BomCR475
T.E. Mane, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the order dated 9-11-1987, passed by the IIIrd Additional Session Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 289 of 1986, convicting and sentencing him to undergo five R.I. and a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Maruti Yelpale Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-27-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 201 and 364; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 163;
1998BomCR(Cri)316
P.P. Hudlikar and ;T.E. Mane, Advs.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this appeal, the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 30-10-1987, passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 215/1986. convicting and sentencing him in the manner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaifan Rahimansaheb Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-24-2000
FamilyCriminal
Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A
II(2000)DMC584
Veera Shinde, Adv. for ;T.E. Mane, Adv.
Ranjana Desai, J.1. The appellant (the accused) was tried for offences punish able under Section 498-A and Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions's Case No. 72 of 1991, in the Court of Sessions,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Ramkrishna Lande Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-30-1997
FamilyCriminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A
II(1998)DMC706
T.E. Mane, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal, the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 6.10.1990, passed by the Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 126 of 1990, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBibhishan Yadav Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-06-1995
Criminal
Inidian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 385 and 432(1)
1996CriLJ1108
Tunaji E. Mane, Adv.
1. Admit. 2. Mr. T. E. Mane, Counsel for the Appellant urges that he is pressing this Appeal only on the quantum of sentence and consequently the same may be disposed of finally by me today....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »