Advanced Search Results
Pareeth Vs. Sub Inspector of Police
Kerala
Jan-27-2003
Labour and Industrial
Headload Workers Rules, 1981 - Rule 26A; Kerala Regulation of Employment and Welfare Scheme, 1983
2003(2)KLT128; (2003)IIILLJ837Ker
T.P.M. Ibrahim Khan, Adv.
Cyriac Joseph, J. 1. The petitioner in this Original Petition is one M.S. Pareeth, Proprietor of M/s. Madathil Traders, Nadakal P.O., Erattupetta, Kottayam District. The respondents are - Sub Inspector of Police, Erattupetta Police Station; Circle...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Bank Vs. Tecon Engineers and ors.
Kerala
Dec-22-1993
BankingCommercial
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226 and 226(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 130; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1994]207ITR691(Ker)
T.R. Govinda Warrier, Sr. Adv. and; Sebastian Davis, Adv.
K.P. Balanarayana Marar, J.1. Canara Bank, Ernakulam, is the petitioner in this original petition. The bank has been giving financial accommodation to the first respondent from October, 1972, onwards in order to enable them to execute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJabir V.B vs the Revenue Divisional Officer
Kerala
Jul-19-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: JABIR V.B AGED 26 YEARS S/O BASHEER, RESIDING AT J.R.M. HOUSE,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sapthagiri Educational Trust rep. by Its Chairman, M. Jothiprakasam, V ...
Chennai
Feb-28-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2003)2MLJ358
N.R. Chandran, Adv. General for R. Suresh Kumar, and ;V. Balaji, Adv. and ;T.R. Rajagopalan, Sr. Counsel for P.V.S. Giridhar and Associates
ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The above three writ petitions involve consideration of common issues and hence taken up together.2. W.P. No. 32296 of 2002 is filed by a Private Unaided Non Minority Institution, established at Pondicherry, seeking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKusa Lingaiah Vs. Pandiri Laxmaiah
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-02-2005
Civil
Indian Partnership Act; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Money Lenders Act - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33
AIR2006AP121; 2006(2)ALD98; 2006(2)ALT228
S.T.P. Satyanarayana Chary, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J.1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful defendant in O.S.No.18 of 1994 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda.2. Respondent-plaintiff filed the above suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,10,350.07...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kumar Garg Vs. U.T., Chandigarh
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-13-2013
Criminal
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Misc. not M-20397 of 2013 ....Date of decision:13.8.2013 Ram Kumar Garg .....Petitioner v. U.T., Chandigarh .....Respondent ...Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Projects and Marketing Ltd. Vs. West Bengal Power Development ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-21-2005
CommercialContract
AIR2006SC116; I(2006)BC119(SC); 2005(2)CTLJ278(SC); [2006(2)JCR47(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC542; 2005(8)SCALE550; (2005)8SCC438
Salman Khurshid,; A.K. Ganguli and; T.S. Doabia, Sr. Advs
P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.1. These appeals arise from Writ Petition No.886 of 1997 filed by Larson & Toubro ('L & T' for short), in the High Court of Calcutta. Respondent No.11 in the Writ Petition Subhash Projects...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamaldeep Synthetic Ltd., by Managing Director V. Nandakumar Vs. Indus ...
Chennai
Sep-08-2006
Banking
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(10), 17, 17(2), 29, 31, 32, 34, 35 and 36; Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Limitation Act, 1963; State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 3 and 31; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2007]139CompCas52(Mad); (2007)1CompLJ190(Mad)
T.L. Ram Mohan, S.C. for J. Anandhavalli and ;G. Sumitra, Advs.
ORDERM. Thanikachalam, J.1. By the consent of either counsel, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The brief facts,leading to this writ:(a) The writ petitioner, for the purpose of manufacture and marketing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Board of Direct Taxes and anr. Vs. Saradha Transport and ors.
Chennai
Jul-02-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 194C; Finance Act, 1972
(2003)180CTR(Mad)468; [2003]260ITR297(Mad); (2002)3MLJ15
T.C.A. Ramanujam, Adv.
B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J. 1. The above batch of writ appeals have been filed questioning the orders of the learned single judge, in striking down Circular No. 681, dated March 8, 1994 (see [1994] 206 ITR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Board of Direct Taxes Vs. Sri Saradha Transport
Chennai
Jul-02-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN168(Mad)
T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue V.P. Venkat, A. Muthukumaran, K. Srinivasan and C. Natarajan, for the Assessee
B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J.The above batch of writ appeals has been filed questioning the orders of the learned Single Judge in striking down Circular No. 681, dated 8-3-1994, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »