Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: swati soparkar · Page 1 of about 84 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 28 2005

Phlox Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-28-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 15 to 19, 31, 32, 94, 97, 187(1), 391 to 394 and 611; Sick Industrial companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1)(O), 22, 26 and 32; Contract Act - Sections 28

Reported in : [2008]114CompCas133(Guj); [2005]63SCL237(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Swati Soparkar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

K.A. Puj, J.1. These petitions are filed by two petitioner Companies for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation proposed to be made between Phlox Pharmaceuticals Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'transferor Company') with Sun Pharmaceutical Industries...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 06 2008

Mekaster Valves and Engineering Services Private Limited

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-06-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 21, 31, 81(1A), 81A, 94, 97, 100, 149(2A), 259, 391 to 394 and 394A; ;Bombay Stamp Act

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas593(Guj); [2010]98SCL8(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Swati Soparkar, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner Company, namely, MEKASTER VALVES & ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED has filed this petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 14 2008

In Re: Sumilon Plastic P. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394

Reported in : [2009]147CompCas189(Guj); [2010]98SCL163(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Vaibhavi Parikh, Adv. for; Swati Soparkar, Adv.; Iqbal S

K.A. Puj, J.1. These are the petitions filed by the petitioner-companies for sanction of a scheme of amalgamation of the three transferor companies, viz., Sumilon Plastic P. Ltd., Sumilon Tex P. Ltd. and Shree Kapil Yarn...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 14 2005

Bazley Finvest Limited

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-14-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 16, 31, 94 to 97, 192, 210A(1), 211(1), 211(3A), 211(3C), 391, 394 and 611; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

Reported in : [2005]64SCL480(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Swati Soparkar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

K.A. Puj, J.1. These are the petitions filed by three petitioner Companies for sanction of a Scheme of Amalgamation of the three (the Transferor Companies) with Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (the Transferee Company) under Section 391...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 28 2005

In Re: Arcoy Overseas P. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-28-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(2) and 394

Reported in : [2006]68SCL255(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Swati Soparkar, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. These are the petitions filed by two petitioner companies for sanction of a scheme of amalgamation of Arcoy Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (the transferor company) with Arcoy Industrial Cements Pvt. Ltd. (the transferee company)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 21 2003

Official Liquidator of Piramal Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Reserve Ban ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441, 441(2), 531 and 531A; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45I; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230A(1)

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas27(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Desai, Adv.; S.N. Soparkar,; Swati Soparkar and

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Report of the Official Liquidator : The official liquidator as liquidator of Piramal Financial Services Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company in liquidation or PFSL'), has filed this report with a prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jul 18 2005

Casil Health Products Limited

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-18-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 80(5A), 97, 391 and 394; Stamp Act

Reported in : [2005]62SCL393(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Swati Soparkar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

K.A. Puj, J.1. These are the petitions filed by three petitioner Companies for sanction of a Scheme of arrangement consisting of Slump Sale of two of the divisions of Casil Health Products Limited (CHPL) to Biosulin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 07 2009

In Re: Nirmay Properties P. Ltd. Vs.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-07-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1), 40, 212, 391 and 394; Bombay Stamp Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 47

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas538(Guj); [2010]97SCL207(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Soparkar and; Swati Soparkar, Advs.; Iqbal A. Shaik

K.A. Puj, J. 1. These are the petitions filed by the petitioner-companies for sanction of a scheme of arrangement in the nature of amalgamation of five transferor companies, viz., Nirmay Properties P. Ltd., Shreya Realities P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Feb 28 2005

Essar Steel Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-28-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 78, 80, 87, 100, 101, 101(2), 102(2), 102(3), 103, 104, 106, 107, 192A, 391 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas123(Guj); (2006)5CompLJ83(Guj); [2005]59SCL457(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Adv. and; Swati Soparkar, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner, namely, Essar Steel Limited has filed this petition under Section 78 and 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 before this Court seeking following prayers :-(a) That the reduction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 08 2002

In Re: Arvind Mills Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-08-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 177, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 391(6) and 394; Bombay Relief Undertaking (Special Provisions) Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4 and 4(1)

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas118(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Soparkar,; Swati Soparkar,; S.B. Vakil,;

N.G. Nandi, J.1. This petition under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') has been filed by Arvind Mills Ltd. ('the company'), seeking sanction to the scheme of restructuring of its debts, floated by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales