Advanced Search Results

Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)265; AIR1994Delhi293; 54(1994)DLT190; 1994(29)DRJ162

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Mehta,; Madan Lokur,; Swaraj Kaushal,;

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) The need for replacement of the existing slaughter house facilities in Delhi has been recognised for over a decade and serious consideration was first given to this as early as ;in 1967. '...

State of Karnataka Vs. K. Gopalakrishna Shenoy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Mysore Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 - Sections 3(1), 4 and 7; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 22 and 38

Reported in : AIR1987SC1911; 1987(2)Crimes879(SC); JT1987(3)SC67; 1987(2)SCALE37; (1987)3SCC655; [1987]3SCR481

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Datar,; Swaraj Kaushal and; M.A. Khan, Advs

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1977.From the Judgment and Order dated 26.3.1976 of the Karnataka High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 169 of 1976: R.B. Datar, Swaraj Kaushal and M.A. Khan for the...

Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(2); Explosive Act, 1884; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 120, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 338; Terriorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 4, 6, 18, 19(1) and 20(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 57, 167(2), 173, 260(1), 262, 263-265 and 436 to 450; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - SectionS 3 and 25(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1994SC2623; 1995CriLJ517; 1994(2)Crimes916(SC); JT1994(4)SC255; 1994(3)SCALE105; (1994)4SCC602; [1994]Supp1SCR360; 1994(2)LC786(SC); MANU/SC/0526/1994

Advocate for Appellant : K.T.S. Tulsi,; K.G. Bhagat,; U.R. Lalit,;

ORDERA.S. Anand, J.1. In this batch of criminal appeals and special leave petitions (criminal) the three meaningful questions which require our consideration are: (1) when can the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Terrorist and Disruptive...

Arvind Mohan Johari and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : [2005]127CompCas389(SC); [2005(3)JCR1(SC)]; JT2005(11)SC478; (2005)4SCC634; [2005]64SCL59(SC)

ORDER1. These applications have been filed for clarification and/or recalling an order dated 3.11.2004 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1265-66 of 2004 whereby and whereunder the respective applicants were directed to deposit the...

Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act - Sections 42, 405, 406 and 407

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi49

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Mehta, Adv

Dalveer bhandari, J.1. The petitioner has filed this public interest litigation in a matter, which very vitally concerns all of us i.e. regarding the inhuman, unhygienic and horrible conditions which are prevalent at the Idgah Slaughter...

S. ShamshuddIn and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 63(7)

Reported in : II(1984)ACC388; AIR1984SC1244; 1984(1)SCALE709; (1984)3SCC583; [1984]3SCR522; 1984(16)LC1031(SC)

D.A Desai, J.1. The intrepid albeit affluent transport operators again succeeded in their none-too-legal designs to operate vehicles not by obtaining statutory permits but to put it mildly by abuse of the court's process.2. By a...

Babu Singh Bains Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 136 and 226; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 8A, 9, 11 and 15; Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Building) (Amendment) Rules, 1979 - Rule 11D; Public Premises Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)882; AIR1997SC116; JT1996(9)SC371; (1997)115PLR250; 1996(7)SCALE548; (1996)6SCC565; [1996]Supp6SCR120

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Gurjal,; S.K. Bagga,; Swaraj Kaushal,;

1. C.A. No. 12931/96 @ SLP No. 4559/93 & W.P. No. 520/94.2. Application of impleadment is dismissed.3. Leave granted in the special leave petition.4. The City of beauty, Chandigarh, carefully architecture and meticulously executed as a...

Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh Society and ors. Vs. State of Madh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Foodstuffs (Distribution) Control Order, 1960; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 162

Reported in : AIR1981SC2001; 1981(3)SCALE1420; (1981)4SCC535; [1982]1SCR750; 1982(14)LC42(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Swaraj Kaushal,; S.S. Khanduja,; A.K. Sen,;

ORDERA.P. Sen, J.1. The only question involved in this and the connected Special Leave Petitions directed against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court is whether the Madhya Pradesh (Food-stuffs) Civil Supplies Public Distribution Scheme,...

Chandigarh Administration and Another Vs. Jagjit Singh and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1995SC705; II(1995)BC191(SC); JT1995(1)SC445; (1995)110PLR176; 1995(1)SCALE131; (1995)1SCC745; [1995]1SCR126

Advocate for Appellant : Swaraj Kaushal,; K. Madhava Reddy,; Naresh Bakshi and;

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. S.L.P. (C) 11609 of 1994. Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties.2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing the writ petition filed by...

Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs. Ascharaj Lal Chopra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 467, 468, 468(1), 469, 469(1), 470(1), 473 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 406, 408, 420 and 500

Reported in : AIR1978SC986; 1978CriLJ764; (1978)2SCC403; [1978]3SCR434

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Agarwal,; Swaraj Kaushal and; S.C. Patel, Advs

1. This appeal by Special leave has been filed by accused Surinder Mohan Vikal against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated March 2, 1977, rejecting his application for revision of the Magistrate's...