Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: swantantar kumar · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.023 seconds)

Feb 26 1993

Indian Railway Construction Company Ltd. and ors. Vs. A.K. Dogra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-1993

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 50(1993)DLT200; 1993(25)DRJ472; (1993)IILLJ45Del

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta,; A.K. Singhia and; Swantantar Kumar, Advs

Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) This is an appeal directed against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated May 27,1991 in Cwp No.3406 of 1990 whereby the orders of the appellant No.1 dated September...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2002

Vijay Kumar and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-25-2002

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 63 and 273; Evidence Act - Sections 68

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi210; 101(2002)DLT385; 2003(66)DRJ364

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Chaudhary, Adv

S. Mukherjee, J.1. This is a probate petition in relation to the Will dated 31.12.89 stated to have been executed by the deceased Swatantar Kumar, s/o late Shri Jai Prakash, r/o Ghaziabad (U.P), who is stated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1974

Joginder Singh Vs. the Bar Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 26(1) and 26(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 20(2);

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi192; 1975RLR15

Advocate for Appellant : D. Latifi,; Swantantar Kumar and; H.N. Hingorani, Advs

T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) The appellant, Joginder Singh, was once an advocate. His grievance is that his name has been struck off the rolls. (2) On 28th March, 1962 he was enrolled as an advocate by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 21 1987

Man Mohan Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1987(13)DRJ111

Advocate for Appellant : Swantantar Kumar and; R.K. Anand, Advs

R.N. Aggarwal, J. (1) We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Swatantar Kumar at length. We have also heard Mr. R.K. Anand on behalf of the respondents.(2) The relevant facts are the on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1993

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Bathla Cassettes India (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 43, Rule 1; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 60

Reported in : 50(1993)DLT7

Advocate for Appellant : Swantantar Kumar,; N.K. Bhardwaj,; Ajay Sawhney and;

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Mr. Swatantar Kumar, appearing for the petitioner, at the outset submitted that instead of treating this petition as Revision, it be treated as an Appeal (FAO).(2) The point in controversy is with regard...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1979

Jasjit Films (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 2A

Reported in : AIR1980Delhi83

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; Swantantar Kumar,; S.N. Chopra and;

S.B. Wad, J. (1) The petitioners in these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution have prayed for a mandamus against the Delhi Development Authority (for short D.D.A.) : 1. for restraining the D.D.A. from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1987

Prabhakar Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Delhi Financial Cor ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-1987

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 66; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 31(1987)DLT367

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Sawhney,; Swantantar Kumar and; Geeta Mittal, Advs

Sananda Bhandare, J.(1) The petitioner company-M/s Prabhakar Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. obtained a loan of Rs. 5,50,000.00 from the respondent- Delhi Financial Corporation against security and the plant and machinery of the petitioner was mortgaged to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1988

Ashok Kumar Bhatnagar Vs. Shabnam Bhatnagar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-05-1988

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi122; 1989(16)DRJ105

Advocate for Appellant : Swantantar Kumar, Adv

Santosh Duggal, J. (1) This is petitioner-husband's Letter Patent Appeal, filed against the dismissal in liming of his appeal by a Learned Single Judge of this Court ; which appeal he had taken against the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1987

S.K. JaIn Vs. P. Subba Rao

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1987

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 33(1987)DLT334

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Bhandare,; Swantantar Kumar,; S.N. Kumar and;

C.L. Chaudbry, J.(1) This is the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 13,64,080.00 and for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants restraining them from releasing any of the pictures mentioned in the plaint, produced by them,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1971

Krishan Chandra Goel Vs. Trilok Chand Jain

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-07-1971

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)(A)

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi230

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Chopra,; Swantantar Kumar and; V.B. Andley, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) In this appeal we are concerned with the construction of proviso (h) to sub-section (1) of section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) which runs as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.