Advanced Search Results
Raghunath Prasad Vs. Firm Seva Ram Tikam Das
Allahabad
Jul-02-1979
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 192 and 226
AIR1980All15
J. Swarup and ;B. Dayal, Advs.
Seth, J.1. This First Appeal by plaintiff. Seth Raghunath Prasad is directed against the decree of the Civil Judge, Agra (who was also exercising powers of Judge, Small Cause Court. Agra) dated 2-6-1956, dismissing his suit.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanti Sarup Vs. Radhaswami Satsang Sabha, Dayalbagh Agra and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-22-1968
Trusts and SocietiesProperty
High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 9; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 13, 19 and 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21, 31, 34, 114 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 15, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 22; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 2(6) and 17; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 122; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Hindu Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42
AIR1969All248
J. Swarup, ;G.S. Pathak and ;Shekhar Prasad Singh, Advs.
S.D. Khare, J. 1. An interesting point of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a gift or dedication of movable property (Rs. 23,038 cash) could be made by a Satsangi of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDIn Dayal Kesho Lal Vs. the Sales Tax Officer Ii and anr.
Allahabad
May-22-1969
Sales Tax
[1970]25STC221(All)
S.N. Misra and ;Swami Dayal, Advs.
Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner, M/s. Din Dayal Kesho Lal (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner), has approached this court under article 226 of the Constitution of India and has prayed for the issue of 'a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Somnath Paul Vs. Ram Bharose
Allahabad
Dec-22-1989
Criminal
Industrial Disputes Act; Uttar Pradesh Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 441; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 427, 441, 447 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 256(1), 300 and 378(4)
1991CriLJ2499
Swami Dayal, Sr. Adv., ;Tapan Ghosh and ;Dayal Saran, Advs.
Palok Basu, J.1. In short, the controversy in all these matters is as to whether if and when a licence to live in a quarter is revoked by a liceneesor, can the licensee be prosecuted for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhaswami Satsang Sabha Vs. Smt. Puttan (Deceased by L.Rs.) and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-16-1983
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8
AIR1984All198
Swami Dayal, Adv.
ORDERV.K. Mehrotra, J.1. In this revision under Section 115. C.P.C. the plaintiffs of a suit filed as far back as in the year 1942, have challenged an order passed by the Second Additional Civil Judge. Agra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAziz Ahmad Khan and anr. Vs. Atthar HusaIn and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-18-1971
PropertyCivil
Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindars' Debt Reduction Act, 1953 - Sections 2
AIR1971All469
Swami Dayal, Adv.
M.N. Shukla, J. 1. This is an execution second appeal arising out of an application made under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the judgment debtors which was allowed by the lower appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChait Ram Saini (Deceased by L.Rs) Vs. Ghasi Ram (Deceased by L.Rs) an ...
Allahabad
Sep-05-1985
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1986All50
A.K. Banerjee, ;Ashok Gupta, ;Swami Dayal, ;V.D. Ojha and ;Santosh Kumar, Advs.
N.N. Mithal, J. 1. This is defendants' second appeal and the only question of importance raised is about limitation. How this question arises would be clear only from the narration of facts. The defendant-appellant had filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLokumal Topan Dass and anr. Vs. Allahabad Bank and ors.
Allahabad
May-13-1998
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3
AIR1998All398
A.K. Tiwari and ;Swami Dayal, Advs.
ORDERO.P. Garg, J. 1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 2-4-1998 passed by Sri V.B. Rai, Vth Additional District Judge, Etawah rejecting the applications paper Nos. 34-Ka, and 42-Ka, moved by the defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidda Ram Vs. Naru Mal and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-08-1964
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106
AIR1965All323
Swami Dayal, Adv.
K.B. Asthana, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant against whom a decree for ejectment from a house situate in the city of Agra and for recovery of arrears of rent has been paused. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharma Prathishthanam Vs. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-02-2004
ArbitrationLimitation
Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 3, 8, 8(2), 9, 20, 14, 14(2), 14(4), 14(5), 17 and 30; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119; Indian Arbitration Rules - Rule 1
AIR2005SC214; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)114; 2004(3)BLJR2295; 2004(5)CTC442; JT2004(9)SC335; (2005)1MLJ70(SC); RLW2005(1)SC151; 2004(9)SCALE205; (2005)9SCC686; MANU/SC/0936/2004
Manoj Swarup,; Lalita Kohli,; Anubhav Kumar and;
R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant-Dharma Prathishthaham is a charitable institution. The respondent is a builder engaged in construction activity. In the year 1985, the appellant proposed to have a building constructed for which purpose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »