Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: swami dayal · Page 1 of about 121 results (0.061 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 1979

Raghunath Prasad Vs. Firm Seva Ram Tikam Das

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-02-1979

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 192 and 226

Reported in : AIR1980All15

Advocate for Appellant : J. Swarup and ;B. Dayal, Advs.

Seth, J.1. This First Appeal by plaintiff. Seth Raghunath Prasad is directed against the decree of the Civil Judge, Agra (who was also exercising powers of Judge, Small Cause Court. Agra) dated 2-6-1956, dismissing his suit.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1968

Shanti Sarup Vs. Radhaswami Satsang Sabha, Dayalbagh Agra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-1968

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 9; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 13, 19 and 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21, 31, 34, 114 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 15, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 22; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 2(6) and 17; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 122; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Hindu Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1969All248

Advocate for Appellant : J. Swarup, ;G.S. Pathak and ;Shekhar Prasad Singh, Advs.

S.D. Khare, J. 1. An interesting point of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a gift or dedication of movable property (Rs. 23,038 cash) could be made by a Satsangi of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1969

DIn Dayal Kesho Lal Vs. the Sales Tax Officer Ii and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-1969

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1970]25STC221(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Misra and ;Swami Dayal, Advs.

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner, M/s. Din Dayal Kesho Lal (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner), has approached this court under article 226 of the Constitution of India and has prayed for the issue of 'a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 22 1989

Somnath Paul Vs. Ram Bharose

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-22-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Uttar Pradesh Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 441; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 427, 441, 447 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 256(1), 300 and 378(4)

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2499

Advocate for Appellant : Swami Dayal, Sr. Adv., ;Tapan Ghosh and ;Dayal Saran, Advs.

Palok Basu, J.1. In short, the controversy in all these matters is as to whether if and when a licence to live in a quarter is revoked by a liceneesor, can the licensee be prosecuted for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1983

Radhaswami Satsang Sabha Vs. Smt. Puttan (Deceased by L.Rs.) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-1983

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1984All198

Advocate for Appellant : Swami Dayal, Adv.

ORDERV.K. Mehrotra, J.1. In this revision under Section 115. C.P.C. the plaintiffs of a suit filed as far back as in the year 1942, have challenged an order passed by the Second Additional Civil Judge. Agra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1971

Aziz Ahmad Khan and anr. Vs. Atthar HusaIn and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-18-1971

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindars' Debt Reduction Act, 1953 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1971All469

Advocate for Appellant : Swami Dayal, Adv.

M.N. Shukla, J. 1. This is an execution second appeal arising out of an application made under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the judgment debtors which was allowed by the lower appellate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1985

Chait Ram Saini (Deceased by L.Rs) Vs. Ghasi Ram (Deceased by L.Rs) an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-05-1985

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1986All50

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Banerjee, ;Ashok Gupta, ;Swami Dayal, ;V.D. Ojha and ;Santosh Kumar, Advs.

N.N. Mithal, J. 1. This is defendants' second appeal and the only question of importance raised is about limitation. How this question arises would be clear only from the narration of facts. The defendant-appellant had filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1998

Lokumal Topan Dass and anr. Vs. Allahabad Bank and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-13-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1998All398

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Tiwari and ;Swami Dayal, Advs.

ORDERO.P. Garg, J. 1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 2-4-1998 passed by Sri V.B. Rai, Vth Additional District Judge, Etawah rejecting the applications paper Nos. 34-Ka, and 42-Ka, moved by the defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1964

Chidda Ram Vs. Naru Mal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-1964

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1965All323

Advocate for Appellant : Swami Dayal, Adv.

K.B. Asthana, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant against whom a decree for ejectment from a house situate in the city of Agra and for recovery of arrears of rent has been paused. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2004

Dharma Prathishthanam Vs. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-02-2004

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 3, 8, 8(2), 9, 20, 14, 14(2), 14(4), 14(5), 17 and 30; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119; Indian Arbitration Rules - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2005SC214; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)114; 2004(3)BLJR2295; 2004(5)CTC442; JT2004(9)SC335; (2005)1MLJ70(SC); RLW2005(1)SC151; 2004(9)SCALE205; (2005)9SCC686; MANU/SC/0936/2004

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Swarup,; Lalita Kohli,; Anubhav Kumar and;

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant-Dharma Prathishthaham is a charitable institution. The respondent is a builder engaged in construction activity. In the year 1985, the appellant proposed to have a building constructed for which purpose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial