Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sushil kr jain · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.103 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2012

Balraj Singh Malik Vs. Supreme Court of India Through

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.P. Singh

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8327 OF 2011 % Pronounced on: 13.2.2012 BALRAJ SINGH MALIK ....PETITIONER Through: Md. Izhar Alam and Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocates with Petitioner in person. VERSUS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2007

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 5(1)(2) and 6; National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 - Sections 11; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Civil Rights Act, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(4), 15(5), 16, 16(4), 340, 340(1), 335, 341 and 342

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1101; JT2007(5)SC276; (2007)2MLJ1211(SC); 2007(5)SCALE179; (2007)4SCC361

Advocate for Appellant : Party in Perso; Gopal Subramanium, ASG.,; J.S. Attri and; Arune

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. In this I.A. prayer has been made to grant interim protection pending final disposal of the writ petitions.2. In the writ petitions the policy of 27% reservation for the Other Backward Classes (in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Raman Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt. and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11466 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.8113 OF2014 RAMAN .........APPELLANT Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.& ORS. .........RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2018

Naresh Vs. The State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2018

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sonal Jain

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 394-395 OF2018Naresh & Ors. ... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. ... Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.396 OF2018JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2018

Manoj & Anr. Vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2018

Subject : Criminal

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5209/2018 Judgment delivered on:10.10.2018 MANOJ & ANR. ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2010

Sharda Kailash Mittal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 20, 22, 29B, 41A, 41A(2) and 51; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Constitution of India - Article 243ZG

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC591; 2010(1)SCALE260; (2010)2SCC319; 2010(2)LC581(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ravindra Kr. Srivastava and; S.K. Dubey, Sr. Advs.,; Suryan

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dismissing W.A. No. 253 of 2008 filed by the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

Rk Hirenkohomba Vs. Gs Patnaik

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

P$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 574/2011 RK HIRENKOHOMBA ..... Petitioner versus GS PATNAIK ..... Respondent Date of decision:5. h July, 2013 Advocates who appeared in this case: For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2009

Bheru Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 341, 427, 436 and 439

Reported in : AIR2009SC3208; 2009CriLJ4118; JT2009(11)SC674; 2009(11)SCALE40; (2009)9SCC119; 2009AIRSCW5142

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Singhvi, Addl. A.G.,; Sushil Kr. Jain,; Pratibha Jain

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of the Criminal Appeal No. 898 of 2004 filed by three appellants as also the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against the acquittal of one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2001

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Vatan Medical and General Store and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 - Sections 28 and 41; Rajasthan Intoxicating Spirituous Preparations, Import, Export, Transport, Possession and Sales Rules, 1989 - Rule 25; Constitution of India- Articles 19(1) and 246; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Provincial Legislatures, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 33; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945; Delhi Intoxicating Spirituous Preparations Import, Export, Transport, Possession and Sales Rules, 1952; Punjab Excise Act - Sections 3(12); Spirituous Preparations (Inter-state Trade and Commerce) Control Act, 1955; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duty) Act, 1955; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Rajasthan Excise Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2001SC1937; JT2001(4)SC187; 2001(3)SCALE62; (2001)4SCC642; [2001]2SCR729; 2001(2)LC983(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kr. Jain, Addl. Advocate General,; A. Misra,; Ms. Anja

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. Leave granted in S.L.P.(C) Nos. 14845/1994 and 11674/1995. 2. The Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (Act No.2 of 1950) was passed by the State Legislature of Rajasthan to enact for Rajasthan a uniform...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Subhash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 376 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 366 and 392; Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)17; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)736; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)60; JT2001(8)SC505; 2001(7)SCALE246; (2002)1SCC702; 2002(1)LC150(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kr. Jain,; A. Mishra,; Ms Anjali Doshi and;

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. The accused-appellant has ben held guilty of offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 376(2)(f) of Indian Penal Code. The trial Court sentenced the appellant to death under Section 302 IPC and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial