Advanced Search Results
R.Rajendran Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai
Jun-27-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14
Mr.R.Surya Prakash, Adv
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in respect of the Proceedings of the second respondent dated 16.8.2011 in Rc.No.7477/E2/2011...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri K.V.S. Raju Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Head Quarter ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-10-2003
Contract
Constitution of India - Article 14, 15(1), 298 and 299
2003(5)ALD233
C.S. Surya Prakash Rao
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. The petitioner is Proprietor of M/s. Sri Raja Taxi Service, Visakhapatnam. He owns thirty-two cars and also sub-contract arrangement with others for supply of cars to run them as cabs. By reason...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirijan Co-operative Corporation Limited Vs. Hukmichand Sachion Kumar ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-16-2006
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24
2007(1)ALD398
N. Sreedhar Reddy, Adv. in Tr. CMP No. 298 of 2006 and; S. Surya Prakash Rao, Adv. Tr. CMP No. 395 of 2006
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two Transfer C.M. Ps are between the same parties and in relation to the same cause of action. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Bank of India, by Its Manager Vs. Nagesh Hariyappa Nayak and ors ...
Karnataka
Jan-22-2003
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 141
III(2003)BC201; ILR2003KAR1435; 2003(4)KarLJ68
N. Surya Prakash, Adv.
Shylendra Kumar, J. 1. This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is by the plaintiff/bank which is aggrieved by the Trial Court declining to decree the suit claim as against the Guarantors...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSridevi Constructions Co., Rep. by Its Managing Partner, Sri M. Rama R ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-17-2004
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Arbitration Act 1940 - Sections 8 and 20
2004(4)ALD471; [2005]ICompCas452(AP)
C.S. Surya Prakash Rao, Adv. for Ravi Cheemalapati, Adv.
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This revision under Section 115 C.P.C. is directed against the order in O.P. No. 41 of 1997, dated 27-08-2002, passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. Petitioners in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Trade Tax Vs. Singh Trading Co.
Allahabad
Aug-24-1999
Sales Tax
Uttar Prades Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11
[2000]119STC475(All)
Surya Prakash, Standing Counsel
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. These two revision petitions by the Commissioner of Trade Tax are directed against an order dated November 11, 1994 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Moradabad, whereby it allowed the dealer's appeals in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Trade Tax Vs. M.K.J. Corporation
Allahabad
Aug-23-1999
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(3), 9(2A), 10 and 10A; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3AAAA and 15A(1)(1); Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 - Rule 12(10)
[2000]119STC45(All)
Surya Prakash, Standing Counsel
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. This revision petition under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been preferred by the Commissioner against an order dated December 6, 1994 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner, Sales Tax Vs. Swastik Glass Enterprises
Allahabad
Jul-14-1999
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948
[2000]118STC109(All)
Surya Prakash, Standing Counsel
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. These three revision petitions by the Commissioner of Sales Tax Under Section 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (now U.P. Trade Tax Act) raise a common question. The dealer-respondents are represented...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThanigachalam S/O Thangavel Vs. Smt.P.Shanthi W/O Late P.Bala Raman an ...
Karnataka
Nov-11-2010
Constitution
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section ,Order 6 Rule 17; Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227;
SRI A.M.SURYA PRAKASH ADV.
ORDER1. Petitioner has filed O.S.No.8110/96 in the City Civil Court, Bangalore, against the respondents to declare him as the absolute owner and to restrain the defendants 1 to 4 & 6 from interfering with his peaceful...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of India Vs. V. Swaroop Reddy
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-23-2000
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 116; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70
AIR2001AP260; 2001(2)ALT388
S. Suryaprakasa Rao, Adv.
N.Y. Hanumanthappa, Acting C.J. 1. The defendant in the suit, viz. Bank of India represented by its Zonal Manager is the appellant in the present appeal whereas the plaintiff in the suit is the Cross-Objector. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »