Advanced Search Results
Shree Cements Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Aug-21-1996
ExciseCivil
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57G, 57I and 173Q(1)
2005(182)ELT315(Raj)
Paras Kuhad, Adv.
ORDER1. petitioner No. 1, is a Company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956. It carries on the business of manufacturing Cement at Beawar.2. The cement manufactured by it is subject to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangilal Vs. Mahesh Chand Purohit
Rajasthan
Feb-08-2000
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35B
AIR2000Raj199; 2000(4)WLC731
B.K. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERArun Madan, J.1. This civil revision petition has been filed against order dated 7-5-99, whereby the learned Additional District Judge, No. 4, Jaipur City dismissed the petitioner's First Appeal No. 34/98 for the reasons of having...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.K. Sharma (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives Smt. Sa ...
Rajasthan
Apr-06-2010
Service
Shri. Suresh Pareek
ORDERMohammad Rafiq, J.1. This writ petition was filed by petitioner way back in the year 1996 with prayer that charge-sheet issued to him on last date of his retirement i.e. 31.03.1990, may be quashed and set...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kamani Engineering Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Sep-26-1996
Limitation
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11 and 173J; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B
2003(159)ELT125(Raj)
B.P. Agarwal, Adv.
M.P. Singh, J.1. The petitioner has claimed the refund of the excise duty wrongly recovered under Item No. 26-AA(ia) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 ('the Act No. 1 of 1944')2. The petitioner is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilip Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Rajasthan
Oct-20-1995
Criminal
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21, 22 and 22(5); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104, 108, 110, 111 and 135; ;Government of India Business Rules
1996CriLJ547
S.R. Bajwa and; V.P. Bishnoi, Advs.
Arun Madan, J.1. In this habeas corpus petition the petitioner has challenged the order of detention of Rikhab Chand alias Raju Bahi, dated 16th September, 1993 passed by the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeev Kumar Pareek Vs. Smt. Shubh Laxmi Pareek
Rajasthan
Dec-05-1988
Family
1988(2)WLN687
Mr. R.K. Pareek
N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. This revision by Sanjeev Kumar husband is directed against an order passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jaipur dated November 16, 1987.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner husband filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirdhari Singh Bapna and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
May-03-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 245
AIR1997Raj24; 1996(3)WLC226; 1996(1)WLN617
Ajeet Bhandari and; P.C. Jain, Advs.
ORDERAnshuman Singh, J.1. Since both these petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of Public Interest Litigation for issuance of direction to the Union of India to enact...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Lords Chloro Alkali Ltd.
Rajasthan
Aug-18-2006
Company
[2007]75SCL237(Raj)
ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The applicant Lords Chloro Alkali Limited (formerly known as Modi Alkalies & Chemicals Limited) filed this application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter shall be referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-19-1995
Criminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 3(5) and 14; Constitution of India - Article 22(5); General Clauses Act - Sections 3(8)
1996CriLJ817; 1995(3)WLC214; 1995(2)WLN158
A.K. Gupta and; Deepak Goyal, Advs.
N.L. Tibrewal, J.1. In this writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner is assailing the validity and legality of the order of detention dated 15th June, 1994 passed against him by the Collector and District Magistrate, Bharatpur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Dec-13-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 75, 149, 380, 454, 457 and 458
1992CriLJ2989; 1992(3)WLC597
Suresh Pareek, Adv.
ORDERMohini Kapur, J.1. The petitioner has been convicted for the offences Under Sections 457, and 380, IPC read with Sections 75, IPC and sentenced as under by the Judicial Magistrate, Sawai Madhopur by his judgment dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »