Advanced Search Results
Ram Dayal Kalla Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Mar-22-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(NULL)450
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee D.R. Zala & T.R. Chawla, for the Revenue.
ORDERN.K. SAIni, A.M.:This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner, dated 22-3-1999, passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 1993-94.2. This appeal was barred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh Kishan Chand Vs. Income Tax Officer
Rajasthan
Dec-10-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)66TTJ(NULL)724
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee R.N. Jangir, for the Revenue
ORDERB. M. Kothari A.M.This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19-8-1993, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment year 1988-89.2. Ground Nos. 1 to 3 raised by the assessee relate to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKedar Dargar Vs. Income Tax Officer
Rajasthan
Dec-27-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)68TTJ(NULL)460
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee B.D. Gurjar, for the Revenue
ORDERB. M. Kothari A.M.This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22-9-1992, passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment year 1989-90.2. The first ground relates to confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 7,000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kumbh Singh Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Nov-30-2000
Direct Taxation
(2002)76TTJ(NULL)306
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee R.N. Jangid, for the Revenue
ORDERAs all these above appeals involve common points so we are disposing them of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. ITA Nos. 2100 to 2107/Jp/1995 are appeals by one assessee, namely, Shri Kumbh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Kumar Pramod Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer
Rajasthan
Dec-10-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)66TTJ(NULL)722
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee R. N. Jangir, for the Revenue
ORDERB. M. Kothari, A.M.This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29-1-1993, passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment year 1991-92. The assessee has raised three grounds but all these three grounds...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Mitharwal Construction Co. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Rajasthan
Aug-25-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)72TTJ(NULL)531
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee R.N. Jangid, for the Revenue
ORDERP.M. Jagtap, A.M.This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) I, Jodhpur, dated 26-9-1995.2. Out of the total seven grounds taken by the assessee in this appeal, grounds 1 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Cotton Mills Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Mar-18-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(NULL)1057
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee. D.R. Zala, for the Revenue.
ORDERMaratha, J.M.This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT (A) dated 21-6-1994 pertaining to assessment year 1988-89.2. The only effective issue before us is whether the penalty levied under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Ali Gopal Singh and Party Vs. Dy. Cit
Rajasthan
Aug-01-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]134TAXMAN677(Raj)
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. With respect to the assessment year 1995-96 the notice for reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was given on 14-5-1997. The assessing officer passed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsstt. Cit Vs. Amar Singh Kishan Chand
Rajasthan
Sep-15-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]134TAXMAN680(Raj)
K.K. Bissa, for the Revenue Suresh Ojha for the Assessee
At the out set, learned counsel for the assessee respondent brought to our notice that identical issue has been considered by this court in the case of CIT v. Jain Construction Co. , wherein, this court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Ali Gopal Singh and Party Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.
Rajasthan
Jan-16-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)180CTR(Raj)104
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee Sundeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue
ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.The controversy involved in this case is very narrow as the assessee has raised the grievance that the case has been reopened without giving the assessee the copy of reasons for reopening.2. Without contesting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »