Advanced Search Results
Bhagwant Genuji Girme Vs. Gangabisan Ramgopal
Mumbai
Mar-20-1940
Contract
AIR1940Bom369; (1940)42BOMLR750
Wassoodew, J.1. These are two cross-appeals from a decree of the First Class Subordinate Judge at Ahmednagar in a suit to recover damages for breach of contract in the amount of Rs. 9,422-15-3 from the defendants....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManeklal Mansukhbhai Vs. Hormusji Jamshedji
Mumbai
Jun-13-1944
PropertyCivil
AIR1945Bom113; (1944)46BOMLR798
Divatia, J.1. This is an application by the defendant for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against a decree of this Court in Second Appeal No. 717 of 1940. The decree in so far...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGenu Ganapati Shivale Vs. Bhalchand Jivraj Raisoni and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-02-1980
CivilContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 95
AIR1981Bom170; (1981)83CALLT1; 1980MhLJ879
H.C. Advani and;S.G. Mandrekar, Advs.
Sujata Manohar, J.1. The original defendant No. 1, Shri Narayanrao Raghunathrao Tulshibagwale, is the Managing Trustee of Shri Ramji Sansthan, Tulshibag, Pune. The above trust has a right to take sand from the bed of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Patanjali Sharma, Dehradun and Others Vs. the Union of India, Through ...
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
May-29-2014
Land Acquisition
Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. These four connected cases were heard together, reserved for orders together and are, therefore, being disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, facts of these cases will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Krishan Sahay and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Jun-27-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 309; Bihar Re-organization Act - Section 73
MUKUL SINHA; RAM NARESH SHUKLA; SANJEEV KUMAR, Advs.
1. Petitioners in all these writ applications were appointed in the year 1997, 1998 and lastly in the year 2007 as Assistant Engineers in the Joint Cadre of Road/Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar. They were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhuji and anr. Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Appointment and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-16-2010
Land Acquisition
Abhishek Yadav; Ashwani Kumar; Shireesh Kumar, Advs
1. The dispute between the promotees and direct recruits in the cadre of Higher Judicial Service of the State of Uttar Pradesh, has been the unending process since decades. Either side being the member of same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUpendra Chandra Singh Vs. Rachhea Singh
Kolkata
Jun-07-1899
Property
(1900)ILR27Cal239
Rampini and Handley, JJ.1. The plaintiff sues the defendant for the rent of certain ferry ghats. The plaintiff is proprietor of a 24 annas share of the taluq Gangapur, in which the ghats are situated. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmesh Chandra Pandey Son of Sri Kuldeep Pandey Vs. State of U.P. Throu ...
Allahabad
Mar-18-2005
Service
Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rules 6, 7, 8 and 8(2); Constitution of India - Article 309
2005(2)ESC1444
Shashi Nandan, ;G.K. Singh and ;Pooja Agarwal, Advs.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. An advertisement appeared in the newspaper inviting applications from the public for appointment to the post of a Sub Inspector (Civil police) for the session 1987-88. The petitioner applied and qualified for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwar Trivikram NaraIn Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., Lu ...
Allahabad
Jul-27-1959
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(1) and 4(3)
AIR1960All264; [1961]41ITR150(All)
Surendra Narain Singh, Adv.
V. Bhargava, J. 1. The question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, for our opinion under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act is :'Whether on a true interpretation of Clause (viii) of Sub-section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Surat Singh Vs. Ram Murat Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-14-1954
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; ;Constitution of India - Article 141
AIR1955All543
A.P. Pandey and ;Surendra Narain Singh, Advs.
Agarwala, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out a suit for a declaration that the plaintiff isentitled to one-eighth share in the property in suitand for delivery of possession over one-eighth shareof one item of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »