Advanced Search Results

Public Sector Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (Saravjanik K ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1697

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sunil Rai, Shri. Ralli

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.09.2006 (Annex. 1) by which the respondent No. 2 has cancelled the allotment of Plot 6, Sector - Pi, Greater Noida made...

Rakesh Kumar vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sunil Rai

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 11.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4049/2024 RAKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Rai, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore...

Narendra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.S. Chandel

1. THIS appeal emanates from the impugned judgment and order dated 14.3.1983 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in S.T. No. 2 of 1982, State Vs. Narendra and others, by which learned trial Judge has...

Court on Its Own Motion vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. K.M.Nataraj, Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Mr. Anmol Chandan, Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Manan Kumar Misra, Mr. S. Prabhakaran, Mr. Ram Shankar, Mr. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Suman Rani

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11652/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: Court on its own motion ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS...

Baljeet Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Drall

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: September 26.09.2014 + CRL.A. 386/2011 BALJEET SINGH & ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B. Badrinath, Advocate versus STATE Through...

Madhu @ Madhukumar vs State by Doddaballapur Rural Police Station

Court : Karnataka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.771/2018 BETWEEN:1. MADHU @ MADHUKUMAR...

Balbiri Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1974 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1513

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Rai, Adv.

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. These are two appeals. Crl. Appeal No. 269 of 1994 was filed by Smt. Balbiri and the other appeal No. 270 of 1994 was filed by Smt. Nirmala. Both these appeals arise from...

Zila Panchayat Through Its Adhyaksh and Upper Mukhya Adhikari (Zila Pa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311(2); C.C.A. Rules, 1930 - Rule 55; Uttar Pradesh State Public Services Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1992 - Rule 15

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC1048

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Chaudhary and ;Sunil Rai, Advs.

B.S. Chauhan and Shishir Kumar, JJ.1. The Zila Panchayat, Aligarh has questioned the validity of the judgment and order dated 02.05.1997 of the U.P. Public Services Tribunal, by which the claim petition of late Ved Prakash...

Manoj Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7409 of 2011 … 1. MANOJ YADAV, SON OF LATE CHAITRAM YADAV.2. MANOHAR KUMAR YADAV.3. MANJAY KUMAR YADAV, BOTH SONS OF SRI BALGIR RAI.4. KISHUN...

Superior Steel Products (Pvt) Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Del ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1992(23)DRJ287

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin,; Sunita Dutt and; A.K. Bhasin, Advs

Mohd. Shamim, J. (1) This is a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act. The petitioner herein through the present petition want that the disputes referred in para 19 of the present petition be referred...