Advanced Search Results

M.D., U.P. Land Dev. Corpn. and anr. Vs. Amar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2003SC2357; [2003(97)FLR642]; JT2003(3)SC615; (2003)IIILLJ220SC; 2003(3)SCALE675; (2003)5SCC388; [2003]3SCR266; 2003(3)SLJ310(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1791

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Gopal Prasad and; S.K. Singh, Adv

ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Division Bench of the High Court. In short and substance, the facts leading to filing of this appeal are:2. The appellant-Corporation took a decision to prepare...

Shanti Kumar Panda Vs. Shakuntala Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145, 145(1), 145(2), 145(4), 145(6), 146 and 146(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Succession Act - Sections 263

Reported in : AIR2004SC115; 2004(1)ALD69(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)473; 2004CriLJ1249; [2004(2)JCR55(SC)]; JT2005(11)SC122; (2004)2MLJ46(SC); (2004)1SCC438

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Punit Dutt Tyagi, Adv

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Shanti Kumar Panda, the appellant before us lodged a complaint with Station Officer, Line Bazar, Jaunpur, whereupon the police filed a report before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (S.D.M.) Sadar, Jaunpur, who made a preliminary...

K.K. Srivastava Vs. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)138PLR338

Advocate for Appellant : Puneet Jindal, Adv.

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length and perused the paper book.2. The petitioner had earlier filed CWP No. 20265 of 2002 which was disposed of by this Court...

Tilak Raj Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 55 and 57

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)362; 1999(49)DRJ18

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Neelam Grover, amices Curia

ORDERJ.B. Goel, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 14th February, 1992 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (ASJ) whereby the appellant has been convicted for...

Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (D) by Lrs. and anr. Vs. B.D. Agarwal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 4, 5(5), 6, 8B and 19B; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 32, 225 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 141 - Order 23, Rules 1 and 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2003SC2686; 2003(5)ALD14(SC); 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)1158; [2003]117CompCas1(SC); RLW2003(3)SC451; 2003(5)SCALE138; (2003)6SCC230

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Singhvi,; P.P. Rao,; Shanti Bhushan,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Whether settlement of a private dispute between the parties to a writ proceeding is permissible in law, is the prime question involved in these batch of appeals which arise out of judgments and...

S.B. Bhattacharjee Vs. S.D. Majumdar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 251(1) and 255(5); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106; Railways Act - Sections 101, 112 and 113; Mizoram Engineering Service Rules, 2001 - Rules 17, 19, 19(3), 19(4) and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 309

Reported in : 2007(7)SCALE190; (2007)10SCC513; 2008(1)SLJ139(SC); 2007AIRSCW3619; AIR2007SC2102; JT2007(7)SC381.

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; C. Mukund,; Ashok Jain,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of an Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2002 providing for the mode and manner for considering the suitability of candidates for promotion from one post to the other, falls for consideration in...

Jayantilal Investments Vs. Madhuvihar Co-operative Housing Society and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 4(1), 4(1A), 7, 7(1), 7A, 10 and 11; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 - Sections 21(1); Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 4(1A), 7, 7(1) and 7A; Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulations of the Promotion of Construction, etc.) Rules, 1964 - Rules 5, 8 and 9; Municipal Regulations; Development Control Regulations

Reported in : AIR2007SC1011; 2007(2)ALLMR(SC)398; JT2007(2)SC368; 2007(2)SCALE81; (2007)9SCC220

Advocate for Appellant : G.E. Vahanvati, S.G.,; Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv.; Kavin Gulati

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. What are the rights and obligations of a promoter under the provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 ('MOFA') is the question...

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: N. Venkataraman, Sr. Counsel, Mohammed Shafiq and Harish V.S, Mohan Parasaran, Assistant Solicitor General, Maninder Singh, Parthasarathy, Atul K. Alur, Sona Badigar, P.S. Dinesh Kumar, Sunil Gupta, Sr.Counsel, Punit Tyagi, N.M. Harish

(Prayer: These Writ Appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.21876-87/2010 dated 07.01.2011.) 1. In all these appeals, the question raised...

State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Vam Organic Chemicals Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Section 7; ;Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Section 4B, 4B(2) and 4B(4); ;Companies Act; ;Electricity Act

Reported in : JT2010(3)SC169,2010(3)LC1268(SC),(2010)29VST1(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; S.K. Dwivedi, AAG,; Aarohi Bhalla

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. Delay condoned.3. Leave granted in the special leave petition. In all these matters, respondents are manufacturers of notified goods. These respondents have been given central registration under...

Commissioner, Trade Tax, U.P. Vs. D.S.M. Group of Industries

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A, 4A(6)(5), 8A, 8(1) and 25; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rules 6 and 6A; Customs Act, 1962; Registration Act, 1908; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; General Caluses Act

Reported in : AIR2005SC271; JT2004(10)SC429; 2004(10)SCALE296; (2005)1SCC657; [2005]139STC269(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. (Additional Adv. General for State of U.P.),; Punit Dutt Tyagi,;

S.N. Variava, J.1. This Appeal is against the Judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 24th May, 2002.2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows.M/s Dhampur Sugar Mills Limited [hereinafter called the `Company'] is having its...