Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sumit goyal · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.051 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 05 2023

M/S Rds Project Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director, Sumit Goyal ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-05-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 14TH BHADRA, AR NO. 111 OF 2023 PETITIONER: M/S RDS PROJECT LTD, SHIHAB THANGAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2023

M/S Rds Project Ltd., Represented by Mr. Sumit Goyal, Managing Directo ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-16-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 25TH KARTHIKA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 2355 OF 2023 IN EP NO.412/2021 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2010

Sadaab. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of criminal Procedure (CPC) - Sections 161, 309; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 420.

Advocate for Appellant : Irfan Chaudhary; Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Advs.

1. This application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 2 of 2010 under Sections 420 and 406 IPC, P.S. Janakpuri, District Saharanpur.2. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2010

Sadaab. Vs.State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.).

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420. 406; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 309

Advocate for Appellant : Irfan Chaudhary; Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Advs.

1. This application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 2 of 2010 under Sections 420 and 406 IPC, P.S. Janakpuri, District Saharanpur. 2. Heard Sri Sunil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2015

Mustakim Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-10-2015

Subject : Education

Pankaj Naqvi, J. Heard Sri Sumit Goyal, learned counsel for revisionist and Ms. Anjum Haq, learned A.G.A. Whether an unmarried major Muslim daughter who is unable to maintain herself, can claim maintenance from her father under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2023

M/S Rds Project Ltd Represented by Its Managing Director, Mr. Sumit Go ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 AR NO. 112 OF 2023 PETITIONER: M/S RDS PROJECT LTD, SHIHAB...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2013

Cwp No.12621 of 2006 Vs. Chandigarh Administration and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.12621 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12621 of 2006 Date of Decision: May 01, 2013 Harwinder Singh Gill and others …..Petitioners Versus Chandigarh Administration and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2014

Ranjeet Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-2014

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Sumit Goyal

Amar Saran and Vipin Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri Sumit Goyal, learned counsel for the appellant and, learned Govt. Advocate for the State. We have perused the record and trial court judgement. This appeal arises out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2010

Babar Mian. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Advocate for Appellant : Sumit Goyal, Adv.

1. Heard Sri Sumit Gopal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sr I.M.Khan, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of applicant by filing his parcha today in the Court, which is taken on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2007

Taipack Limited and ors. Vs. Ram Kishore Nagar Mal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7(4) and 34; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18 - Schedule - Articles 14 and 15; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 18 and 19

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR402(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Dewan and; Sumit Goyal, Advs

Vipin Sanghi, J.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FACTS.1. This petition has been filed by M/s Taipack Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (The Act) challenging the award dated 14.8.2001 made by sole arbitrator...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial