Advanced Search Results
Sumer Chand (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Aug-22-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1995CriLJ1042
Lokendra Dobhal and ;Dilip Kumar, Advs.
Palok Basu, J. 1. Both these appeals arise out of the Judgment and order dated 18-6-1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dchradun in S. T. No. 148 of 1988 whereby both the appellants stand convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadeo and ors. Vs. the Sub-divisional Officer, Kunda and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-16-1958
Election
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rule 25
AIR1959All43
S.C. Khare and ;N.C. Upadhaya, Advs.
ORDERV.G. Oak, J. 1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution is directed against a decision of the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Kunda, district Partabgarh, dismissing an election petition. Maha-deo and nine others are the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumer Chand S/O Late Sardha Ram Vs. Ram Kishan Kaura and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-20-1990
Family Property
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 16 - Order 41, Rule 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 58 and 65
AIR1991P& H103
Mr. Jaswant Jain, Adv.
1. This appeal is by the defendant filed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, dated Dec. 16, 1986, whereby suit filed by Ram Kishan Kaura and others was partly decreed as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Baljit Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Sep-06-1976
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 117, and 313; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 149, 300, 302, 304 and 323
AIR1976SC2273; 1976CriLJ1745; (1976)4SCC590
D.P. Uniyan Sr. Adv. and; O. P. Rana, Adv
S. Murtaza Fazl Ali, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 251 of 1971 and Criminal Appeals Nos. 273 and 274 of 1971 arise out of the same trial and a common judgment given by the trial Court and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanraj JaIn Vs. Smt. Suraj Bai
Rajasthan
Aug-23-1972
FamilyCivil
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6, 9 and 11; Hindu Law; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2
AIR1973Raj7; 1972()WLN623
Sumer Chand, Adv.
Joshi, J.1. This regular first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge. Sirohi, dated 9th September, 1966 decreeing the plaintiffs' suit for declaration that adoption of the appellant Dhanraj by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Industrial Trust Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jan-15-1969
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34, 34(1A), 34(1) and 42
[1969]74ITR385(Raj); 1969()WLN157
Sumer Chand Bhandari, Adv.
Bhandari, C.J.1. These four cases relate to the same assessee, namely, the Industrial Trust Limited, Jaipur, a limited company (hereinafter called 'the company'), and raise similar questions of law and they are, therefore, disposed of by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Ganpatrao Kamdi and ors. Vs. Liladhar S/O Laxman Pathode and o ...
Mumbai
May-05-2008
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 13B, 13B(1), 13B(2), 21(11A), 73, 73(1), 73(1A), 73A, 73B, 73(1B), 73(1C), 73(1D), 73G, 91, 91(1), 91A, 144C, 144F, 144L, 144T, 144X and 165(1); Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100 and 100(1); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 12, 21 and 22; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1971 - Rules 19, 19(2), 74 and 81
2008(4)ALLMR223; 2008(6)MhLj391
Paliwal, Adv.
Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. It is a settled cannon of interpretative law that recital or preamble of an Act is key for opening the meaning and intent of an Act. Equally true it is that preamble of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhani Ram and ors. Vs. Sumer Chand and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-27-1926
Property
AIR1927All182
1. We think this appeal ought to be allowed. The matter is a simple one and arises out of proceedings taken tinder Section 144 of the Civil P.C. by Dhani Ram and others.2. These applicants are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMusammat Jhamola Kunwar Vs. Thakur Hanwant Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-24-1922
Land Acquisition
AIR1922All129; 66Ind.Cas.915
1. These are cross-appeals against a decree of the Additional Judge of Allahabad. We have heard Counsel at length in both oases and have come to the conclusion that the decision of the Court below should...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Parkash Rohila Vs. Sat Pal and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-03-1992
PropertyCivil
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 2 and 13; Rent Restriction Act - Sections 13
(1993)103PLR168
Girish Agnihotri and; Deepak Agnihotri, Advs.
ORDERN.K. Kapoor, J.1. This is landlord's revision-petition against the order of the Appellate Authority whereby order of the Rent Controller dismissing his eviction application has been upheld.2. Briefly put, Om Parkash filed a petition under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »