Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sumathy dandapani · Page 1 of about 643 results (0.165 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 30 2011

E.M. Antony and Others Vs. V.N. Mathur and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-30-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: K.A. Abraham, Shafik, M.A, Martin G. Thottan, Mrs Sumathi Dandapani Senior with Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mrs Sumathi Dandapani, Senior, Thomas Ma

DR K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. As early as in 1994, a common order in respect of the following fourteen O.As was passed: O.As.552/90, 483/91, 992/92, 1793/92, 375/93, 401/93, 430/93, 603/93, 622/93, 626/93, 990/93, 1283/93. 2078/93...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2010

K.K. Remani, Additional Secretary to Government Home Department, Gover ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : May-17-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Mr. N. N. Sugunapalan, Senior with Mr. S. Sujin, Sumathi Dandapani, Senior with Ms. Jebi Mather, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. N. K. Thankachan, GP and Mr.N.Manoj Kumar, GP, M

The Original Applications No. 118/10 and No. 184/10 were heard together as the main and common prayer of the applicants therein is for their inclusion in the select list for filling up two vacancies for appointment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2011

C. Girija Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Nov-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Shafik M.A, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mrs. Sumathi Dandapani (Senior) with R1 - R4, Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, M.R. Rajendran Nair (Sr) with R9, Ms. Rekha Vasudevan, Advocates

K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. The applicant in this O.A. is presently working as Office Superintendent Grade-I in the Personnel Branch of Southern Railway, Palghat. She had responded to the notification dated 14.10.1999 for filling...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1983

C.M. Chandramathy Vs. Kasaragod Bus Transport Co. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-05-1983

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Consitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47A; Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 177A(4), 177A(5)

Reported in : AIR1983Ker273

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Dandapani and; Sumathi Dandapani, Advs.

ORDERK.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The petitioner is a stagecarriage operator. In this O. P. she seeksto quash Ext. P-10 judgment passed bythe 5th respondent, the State TransportAppellate Tribunal, Eruakulam dated19-5-1983. The 4th respondent-RegionalTransport Authority, Cannanore-considered the grant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2009

Sudheer T. Vs. M.V. Susheela and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-09-2009

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 22; Appropriation Act; Motor Vehicles Act; General Clauses Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 363; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 15; Constitution of India - Articles 53(1), 77, 123, 154(1), 166, 166(3), 217(3), 311(2) and 361; Kerala Education Rules - Rules 3, 4, 4(4), 5, 5A, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 10, 12, 14, 51A and 59

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ369

Advocate for Appellant : Sumathy Dandapani, Sr. Adv. and; Millu Dandapani, Adv.

K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. The point that arises for decision in this case, is the applicability of the principle 'he who decides must hear/he who hears must decide' to Governmental decisions. This Writ Appeal was referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2012

Praveen M and Another Vs. Union of India Represented by the General Ma ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Feb-23-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: T.C. Govindaswamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mrs. Sumathi Dandapani Sr. Advocate, Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Advocate.

K. NOORJEHAN, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. Brief facts of the case as stated by the applicants are that in response to a notification dated 30.1.2010 issued by the respondent No.3 the applicants applied for the post of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1999

Simi Raj, S.P. Vs. the Commissioner for Entrance Examinations, Trivand ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226

Reported in : AIR2000Ker76

Advocate for Appellant : Sumathi Dandapani, Adv.

Radhakrishnan, J.1. Petitioner submits that he belong to Latin Catholic Other than Anglo-Indian community. On the basis of Prospectus for Admission to Professional Degree Courses, 1999, petitioner submitted application for Engineering/ Medicine Courses. Earlier petitioner's rank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2002

Ajith Kumar Vs. Regional Transport Authority

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-14-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 71 and 71(3)

Reported in : II(2002)ACC115; AIR2002Ker178

Advocate for Appellant : Sumathy Dandapani, Adv.

R. Rajendra Babu, J. O.P. 17712/2001 1. Petitioner K.T. Sureshan applied for four months temporary permit on the route Chaliam-Providence College a city permit as notified by the RTA, Kozhikode in the vacancy of stage carriage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2002

Sureshan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-14-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 71(3) and 74(3)

Reported in : I(2003)ACC62

Advocate for Appellant : Sumathy Dandapani, Adv.

R. Rajendra Babu, J. O.P. No. 17712/2001 : 1. Petitioner K.T. Sureshan applied for four months temporary permit on the route Chaliam-Providence College a city permit as notified by the RTA, Kozhikode in the vacancy of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2010

Roby Abraham Vs. Union of India, Represented by the General Manager an ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Dec-14-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: C.S. Ajith Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mrs. Sumathi Dandapani (Senior. Advocate) with Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Advocate.

1. This O.A. has been filed by the applicant mainly for quashing Annexure A-14 order transferring him from Ernakulam to Podannur, and for a direction to retain him at Ernakulam and to disburse the pay and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial