Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sudhir kumar dutta · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 09 1955

Sm. Krishna Subala Bose and ors. Vs. Dhanapati Dutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-09-1955

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 11 - Order 41, Rule 27(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 18(2), 44, 63, 76, 115 and 167; ;Crown Grants Act, 1895 - Section 2; ;Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Section 8; ;Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Tenancy Laws; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 158; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 20; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Section 47

Reported in : AIR1957Cal59

Advocate for Appellant : Pramatha Nath Mitra, ;Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.

Guha Ray, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of the heirs of the referring claimant Dulal Chand Bose, that is, Claimant No. 1 from the judgment of the President of the Calcutta Improvement Trust Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1975

Narayan Chandra Ghosh and anr. Vs. Sanat Kumar Das and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-1975

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Section 8(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1975Cal290

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Adv.

ORDERSalil Kumar Datta, J. 1. This Rule was obtained against the appellate order dated March 19, 1974 in Misc. Appeal No. 127 of 1973 disallowing an application for pre-emption under Section 8(1) of the West Bengal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1958

Bhutnath Das and ors. Vs. Sahadeb Chandra Panja

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-16-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 151; ;Specific Relief Act - Section 35

Reported in : AIR1962Cal485,66CWN645

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Adv.

Das Gupta, J.1. This case raises a question of considerable importance and of some difficulty. The question is whether a trial court after it has ordered specific performance of a contract, on a sum or money...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 1953

Mayasankar Vyash (Vallavji) and ors. Vs. Gouri Sankar Matilal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-10-1953

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 13; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151

Reported in : AIR1954Cal256,58CWN463

Advocate for Appellant : Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.;Hemendra Kumar Das, Sr. Govt. Pleader

1. The appellants filed this appeal valuing the same at Rs. 10,081/8/- with court-fee stamps for Rs. 772/87-. On an objection raised by the Stamp Reporter a reference was made to the Taxing Officer under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1958

Earnest Bento Souza Vs. John Francis Souza and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104 and 123; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59 and 63

Reported in : AIR1958Cal440

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.

Renupada Mukherjee, J.1. The appellant of this appeal is the propounder of the last will and testament said to have been executed by a Goanese Indian Christian woman who instead of being described by her long...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1951

Atula Bala Dasi and ors. Vs. Nirupama Devi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-27-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 and 151 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 247 and 269

Reported in : AIR1951Cal561

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. This is an application in revision on behalf of the D. Hs. against an order passed by the Dist. J. of Birbhum staying the sale in Title Execution Case No. 7 of 1950....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1956

Sk. Abdul Mannan and ors. Vs. Mutwali of Sm. Janebali and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-25-1956

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 19A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; ;Muhammedan Law

Reported in : AIR1956Cal584

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. On 29-1-1946, the plaintiff respondent brought the present suit for declaration of her title to the suit properties as Mutwalli of the Waqf, to which the said properties were admittedly dedicated. The two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1951

Kasiswar Basu Vs. Nakuleswar Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-12-1951

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1952Cal738

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ; Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs.

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. The present appeal arises out of a suit brought by a member of a joint Hindu family for partition.2. One Sitanath Basu died leaving a widow Tarangini and six sons, Bireswar, Kasiswar, Triguneswar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2016

Debabrata Dutta and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1799 of 2015 --------- 1. Debabrata Dutta, S/o Late Sudhir Kumar Dutta.2. Nandika Dutta @ Nandita Dutta, W/o Sri Debabrata Dutta. Both residents of C/O M/S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1981

Jethabhai Khatau and Co. Vs. Luxmi Narayan Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 52

Reported in : AIR1981SC1201; 1981(1)SCALE800; (1981)3SCC61; [1981]3SCR449; 1981(13)LC497(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kacker H.R. Puri, Advs

1. M/s. Jethabhai Khatu & Co., a partnership firm, is the appellant in all the three appeals. The respondents in all the three appeals are : (1) Luxmi Narayan Cotton Mills Ltd., an incorporated Company ('company'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial