Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sudhir kumar dutt · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.046 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 1965

Radhakrishna Hazra Vs. Joykrishna Hazra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-04-1965

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; ;Easements Act, 1882 - Section 60

Reported in : AIR1967Cal204

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Adv. in No. 447/60 and ;Prafulla Kumar Chatterjee (Jr.), Adv. in No. 1202/60

P.N. Mookerjee, J. 1. These are two appeals by the two contending parties against the same judgment of the lower appellate court.2. The suit was a suit for eviction on the ground that the defendant was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1974

Walamji Lalji Vs. Anil Charan Bangal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-1974

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Section 5(1); ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1957; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 54; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56 and 65

Reported in : AIR1975Cal92,78CWN735

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutt and ;Sudhindra Kumar Palit, Advs.

Sen Gupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the decision of Shri S. K. Ghosh, District Judge, Bankura in Money Appeal No. 11 of 1958 affirming the judgment and decree passed by Shri B. C. Choudhury....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1953

Achala Sundari Dassi Vs. Satish Chandra Mondal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-04-1953

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;West Bengal Non-agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 2(4) and 24

Reported in : AIR1954Cal28,57CWN703

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.

ORDERChunder, J.1. This Rule was issued in connection with pre-emption proceedings under Section 24, Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act. The petitioner is a tenant under a raiyat i.e. according to the classification of the Bengal Tenancy Act he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 18 1960

Upendra Nath Naskar and ors. Vs. Satya Charan Gangopadhya and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-18-1960

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 66; ;Evidence Act - Section 116

Reported in : AIR1961Cal151

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Adv.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. The appellants before me were the defendants in a suit for assessment of fair and equitable rent for the suit land. According to the plaintiffs, they derived title to the suit lands through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1959

Alex. A. Apcar (Jr.) and Co. Vs. M.N. Gan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25FF

Reported in : AIR1960Cal14,63CWN674

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.;Prodyot Kumar Banerjee, Adv.

ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J. 1. This is an application by Dinesh Vrajlall described as the proprietor to Alex. A. Apcar (Junior) and Co. under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of certiorari challenging the decision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1949

Bholanath Chatterjee and anr. Vs. Chandra Shekhar Bhattacherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-02-1949

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 39 and 39(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Cal53

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.

ORDERG.N. Das, J.1. This rule was obtained by the de-fend ant against an order of the Munsiff of Dubrajpur, District Birbhum, dated 28th September 1948. By the said order the learned Munsiff overruled certain objections taken...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1957

Sushil Kumar Chakravarty Vs. Ganesh Chandra Mitra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-26-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 111; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 27; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114

Reported in : AIR1958Cal251,62CWN193

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutt and ;Manick Ch. Banerji, Advs.

K.C. Das Gupta, J.1. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the decision of Renupada Mukherjee J., dismissing a second' appeal to this Court against a decree for ejectment raises the question whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1965

Manibala Dassi Vs. TamizuddIn Saha and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-25-1965

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 6, 8 and 9

Reported in : AIR1966Cal307,69CWN829

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Adv.

ORDERD. Basu, J.1. This Rule is directed against an order of dismissal of an application under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure which has been affirmed by the learned District Judge. Howrah....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1959

Sri Provash Chandra Sett and ors. Vs. Gouripore Electric Supply Co. Lt ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-16-1959

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 51; ;Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : AIR1960Cal311

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.

ORDERR.S. Bachawat, J.1. In this Rule the petitioners ask for an appropriate Writ quashing an order dated 29th July 1956 made by the State of West Bengal under Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1960

Gopiram Onkarmall Vs. Sewantilal Punam Chand

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1960

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103

Reported in : AIR1960Cal580,65CWN483

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.

Renupada Mukherjee, J.1. The defendant of the trial court which is a firmof the name and style of Gopiram Onkarmal, is appellant in this appeal. The suit out of which thisappeal hag arisen was instituted in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial