Advanced Search Results
Gulab Chandra Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-30-2009
Constitution
2009(2)AWC1066
Sri. Satish Kumar Singh Kushwaha
R.K. Agrawal and S.P. Mehrotra, JJ.1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 25th December, 2008, passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Kumar Gupta S/O Sri Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. Through ...
Allahabad
Nov-06-2006
Family
2007(2)AWC1780
Vinod Prasad, J.1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by Manoj Kumar Gupta son of Sri Vijay Kumar Gupta, Resident of Village and Post Haldi, P.S. Haldi, District Ballia, presently residing at Malli Bazar, Police...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavIn Chand Nemichand Jaweri Vs. Firm Tulsi Domestic Appliances and or ...
Rajasthan
Feb-06-1997
LimitationCivil
1997WLC(Raj)UC533; 1997(1)WLN170
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The starting point of limitation for filing an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC should be construed from the date of the decree or from the date of knowledge of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ajay Kumar Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
May-22-1985
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2(4) and 482
1986CriLJ932; 1986RLR41
Madan Bhatia,; P.P. Malhotra,; J.U. Khan,;
H.L. Anand, J. (1) The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by Ajay Kumar, raises the question as to the validity and propriety of appointment of an Advocate of an aggrieved party...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Kumar Arya Vs. Messrs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Unit : the ...
Kolkata
Aug-16-1991
Motor VehiclesInsurance
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 95;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;; Limitation Act, 1963 -Schedule - Article 44;; Indian Contract Act - Section 28;; Arbitration Act - Section 34
1992ACJ1026,AIR1992Cal110
Sudhir Kumar Bose and ;Partha Sarathi Bose, Advs.
ORDERAbani Mohan Sinha, J.1. Thisappeal by plaintiff-appellant is directed against the judgment and decree of dismissal passed by the learned Judge 4th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Money Suit No. 65 of 1974. The plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhattacharjee (Agency) and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tarak Nath Banerjee
Kolkata
Jun-16-1971
Commercial
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 22; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 101
AIR1972Cal393
Sudhir Kumar Bose and ;Hari Narayan Mukherjee, Advs.
M.M. Dutt, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the defendant and it arises Out of a suit for recovery of money.2. The case or the plaintiff as made in the plaint is as follows:--The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Kumar Bhalla Vs. Jagdish Chand, Etc. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
May-01-2008
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 138(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 463, 465, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156
AIR2008SC2407; 2008(5)BomCR486; (2008)4CALLT57(SC); 2008CriLJ3004; JT2008(6)SC549; 2008(6)SCALE626; (2008)7SCC137; 2008AIRSCW3631; AIR2008SC2407; 2008(7)SCC137; 2008CriLJ3004
P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv.,; Aman Preet Singh Rahi,; D. Tripat
ORDER1. Leave granted in all the above-said Special Leave Petitions.2. We have seven appeals before us in which the parties are similar. Since all these appeals arise out of common judgments and orders dated 25.01.2007 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Kumar Bhadani and ors. Etc. and Vs. State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Nov-13-2006
Criminal
[2007(2)JCR79(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. Both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are being taken together filed by different sets of petitioners arising out of common cause of action in respect of Complaint Case No. 339/2003 pending in the Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLadoo Vs. the State
Delhi
Jul-13-1984
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 394
26(1984)DLT254
B.K. Sarin and; D.R. Sethi, Advs
D.R. Khanna, J.(1) Rajesh Kumar aged about 19 years, his brother Sudhir Kumar aged about 16 years and Mahender Kumar aged about 15 years, all residents of a house near clock tower Subzi, Mandi Delhi, were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Bellappa
Karnataka
Sep-28-2016
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 14.03.2012 passed in MVC No.106/2011 on the file of the District Judge, Member, MACT, Chamarajanagar, awarding a compensation of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »