Advanced Search Results

Rashtra Deep Laboratory Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1983]53STC419(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Agarwal, Adv.

V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. M/s. Rashtra Deep Laboratory, Firozabad, is the applicant in this Court in the present revision under Section 11(1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act. It has assailed the view taken by the...

Rama Kant Misra Son of Hira Mani Misra Vs. Committee of Management, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 2(1); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulation 6; Uttar Pradesh High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 - Sections10, 10(1), 10(2), 11;, 12, 12A,12B, 12C,13 14,15, 15(1) and 15A; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Services Commission Rules, 1983 - Rules 4 to 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(5) and 3(7);

Reported in : 2005(4)ESC2517

Advocate for Appellant : Raj Kumar Jain, ;Hari Shanker Misra, ;R.K. Singh and Anil Bhushan, Advs.

V.K. Shuklal, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to instant writ petition in brief is that in the district of Allahabad there is a recognised institution known as Badri Nath Tiwari Inter College, Meja Road, Allahabad. Said...

Harihar Man Singh Vs. Chairman, U.P. State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2230; (2003)1UPLBEC487

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Verma and ;Yashwant Varma, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This is a bunch of writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law and hence they are being decided by a common judgment. In most of the writ petitions, counter and rejoinder-affidavits...

Ravindra Nath Chaubey Vs. District Judge, Ballia

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : U.P. Subordinate Civil Court Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 14(3); Constitution of India - Articles 23 and 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC607a; [2001(89)FLR112]; (2001)1UPLBEC380

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Singh, ;G.K. Singh, ;R.N. Singh and ;A.P. Sahi, Advs.

ORDERO. P. Garg, J.1. The petitioner-Ravindra Nath Chaubey is working in class-III cadre of Judgeship of Ballia. In course of time, he came to be promoted from the initial scale of pay of Rs. 3,050-4,500 to...

Vijay Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 14, 16, 162, 226, 307, 309 and 313; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 2 and 46(2); Executive Instructions or Orders and Statutory Rules; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Service (Age Limit) Rules, 1972

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1191; (2004)3UPLBEC2778

Advocate for Appellant : Om Prakash Misra, ;A.K. Singh and ;V.K.S. Choudhury, Advs.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The Division Bench of this Court while hearing the Special Appeal No. 1143 of 2001, Vijay Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors., against the judgment and other of the learned...

Subash Chand Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 15, 25 and 25A; U.P. Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1999; Service Rule; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3661; (2004)3UPLBEC2751

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;V.D. Chauhan, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri'Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri V.D. Chauhan for petitioners and Sri Sudhir Agarwal, Additional Advocate General as well as Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, Additional Standing Counsel for State respondents.2. With consent...

The District Judge and the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature through It ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : The Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rules 9, 10, 11, 14, 14(3) and 15; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Ministerial Staff of the Subordinate Offices Rules, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 21, 226, 235 and 309; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1509

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Agarwal and ;Amit Sthalekar, Advs.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The District Judgeship of Baghpat, which came into existence on account of the newly created District of Baghpat, has engaged the attention of the High Court continuously on account of un-ending controversies surrounding...

Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature, Through, Its ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 39, 226, 229 and 229(1); Allahabad High Court officers and Staff (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1976 - Rules 36 and 40(3)

Reported in : (1998)2UPLBEC1059

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Agarwal, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J.1. With a view to espouse the cause and vindicate the grievances of its members, the Class IV Employees Association of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and its Secretary, Manbodh Yadav, have knocked...

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and Others Vs. Manglesh Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Courts Staff (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1976 - Rules 4(1) and 5(2), (3) and (4); Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 6; Uttar Pradesh Family Court Rules, 1995

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2986; [2000(87)FLR470]

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.A. Kazmi and ;Sudhir Agarwal, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and P.K. Jain, JJ. 1. The appellants, who were respondent Nos. 2.1 and 3 respectively in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13299 of 1997 assail validity of the judgment dated 21.5.1997 quashing the...

District and Sessions Judge Vs. Ratnesh Kumar Srivastava and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 235 and 335; Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rule 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC724; (2005)2UPLBEC1156

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Agarwal and ;Amit Sthalker, Advs.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. These Special Appeals have been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 8.12.2004 staying the operation of the order dated 30th October, 2004 passed by the District Judge, Baghpat, by...