Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sudarshan · Page 1 of about 3,178 results (0.486 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 21 1998

Smt. Narmada Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-21-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1952 - Sections 152 and 502: Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Sudarshan, Adv.

Sachchidanand Jha, J.1.The petitioner seeks quashing of the order of the Administrator, Gaya Municipal Corporation, dated 16-1-95 raising the annual valuation of the house bearing holding No. 49. within ward No. 2, situate at Law Road,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2011

Mohd Mussabir and anr Vs. State and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323, 34, 308; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 360

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudarshan Rajan; Mohd. Qamar Ali, Advs.

1. This judgment would dispose of two appeals, by which, the complainants/informant claim to be aggrieved by the conviction of the second respondent (hereafter called Jamil Ahmed) as well as the direction that he ought to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1985

Govanji Vs. Smt. Kaduva

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1985

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)307

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Suresh Shrimali

Panna Chand Jain, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 24th April, 1984, passed by the District Judge, Doongarpur, in Civil Misc. Case No. 15/82 by which the marriage between the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 13 2008

Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-13-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 4, 120B, 498A and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 188; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : AIR2008SC2392; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)381; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)350; 2008CriLJ3065; (2008)3GLR2468(SC); 2008(2)KLT907(SC); RLW2008(2)SC1664; 2008(7)SCALE519; (2008)6SCC789; 2008AIRSCW3962(2008)3SCC(Cri)151; 2008(3)AICLR480; 2008(4)Supreme308; 2008(3)KCCRSN188

Advocate for Appellant : Sundershan Rajan and; J. Verghese, Advs. for; Jyoti Mendirat

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Section 4 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure fall for our consideration in this appeal which arises out of a judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2005

Surendra Bhatia Vs. Poonam Bhatia and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 5, 5(2), 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 371 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 29A and 29B; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR2006Raj128; I(2006)DMC667; RLW2006(1)Raj612; 2006(1)WLC648

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Bhandari, Sr. Adv.,; Rizwan Ali and Naina Saraf, Advs.

V.K. Bali, J. 1. Sudarshan Bhatia, born and brought up in the State of Rajas-than, but stated to be a Canadian citizen, died on 21.4.1989 in Germany leaving behind considerable movable and immovable properties. Poonam Bhati...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2007

Shri Ramesh Tukaram Gadhwe, Vs. Sou. Sumanbai Wamanrao Gondkar and

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-24-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Mayne's Hindu Law; Guardian and Wards Act - Sections 17 and 17(3)

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR351; 2008(1)BomCR634; 2008(2)MhLj347

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul S. Kulkarni, Adv.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This appeal arises out of Judgment rendered by learned District Judge, Kopargaon, in proceedings under the Guardian and Wards Act. By the impugned Judgment, application filed by respondent No. 1 - Sou. Sumanbai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2012

Dr. Digambar Behera Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: A.K. Behera, Advocate. For the Respondents: R5, Balram Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Sudarshan Rajan, R4, Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Tarun Gupta, R1 to R3, Amit Anand, Advocates.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The applicant, though considered for the post of Director PGIMER Chandigarh, was not selected. Impugning the selection process on various grounds, the OA seeks by way of relief; Quash and set aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2026

Anil Kumar @ Kallu vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Ms. Devyani Singh, Mr. Aman Usman, Mr. Manvendra Yadav, Mr. Vikasdeep Sharma, Mr. Shafiq Khan, Ms. Anjani Suri, Mr. Sudarshan Jha, Mr. Aman Usman, Mr. Manvendra Yadav

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 05thFebruary, 2026 Pronounced on: 21st April, 2026 + CRL.A. 557/2004 ANIL KUMAR @ KALLU .....Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Devyani Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2026

Surya Narain vs State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Ms. Devyani Singh, Mr. Aman Usman, Mr. Manvendra Yadav, Mr. Vikasdeep Sharma, Mr. Shafiq Khan, Ms. Anjani Suri, Mr. Sudarshan Jha

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 05thFebruary, 2026 Pronounced on: 21st April, 2026 + CRL.A. 557/2004 ANIL KUMAR @ KALLU .....Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Devyani Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2026

Director General Esic Headquarter & Ors vs Anil Kumar Kalra & ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Prema Priyadarshini, Mr. Priyansh Kanwar, Mr. Vikas Roy, Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Ms. Samiksha, Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Ms. Samiksha, Mr. Sudarshan Rajan

$~90 to 92* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 203/2008 UOI THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Prema Priyadarshini, Mr. Priyansh Kanwar and Mr. Vikas Roy, Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial