Advanced Search Results
A.H. Magermans Vs. S.K. Ghose and ors.
Kolkata
May-19-1965
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 5, 14, 53, 77(2), 166(1), 166(2), 245, 258 and 258(1); ;Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1939 - Rules 3, 7(3) and 13(1); ;Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 3(2); ;Foreigners Order, 1948; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; ;Indian Passport Rules, 1950
AIR1966Cal552,70CWN82
Party in person;Subrata Roy Choudhury, Adv.;Advocate General, ;Junior Standing Counsel and ;S. Bose, Adv.
B.C. Mitra, J.1. The appellant, a Belgian national, came to India on November 23, 1947, as a Roman Catholic Missionary and discharged his duties as such, at Ranchi and Calcutta. In February, 1952, he gave up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.C. Paul Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kolkata
Sep-12-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(3), 66(1), 66(2), 131 and 256(2); ;Indian Income Tax Act, 1922
(1981)20CTR(Cal)275,[1982]136ITR395(Cal)
Subrata Roy Chowdhury, ;S. Bhattacharjee and ;Aparna Datta, Advs.
C.K. Banerji, J.1. This reference under Section 256(2) of the I.T. Act 1961, arises out of the income-tax assessment of Sri Bhupesh Chandra Paul also known as B. C. Paul, the assessee, for the assessment year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chartered Bank Vs. the Commissioner for the Port of Calcutta
Kolkata
Nov-22-1971
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34 and 40
AIR1972Cal198
Subrata Roy Choudhury, Adv.
B.C. Mitra, J.1. The respondent instituted Suit No. 2556 of 1967. (The Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta v. The Chartered Bank) for recovery of Rs. 7,35,000/- and for other reliefs. The basis of the respondent's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mrs. Usha Uthup Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-01-1983
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; ;West Bengal Mahajati Sadan Act, 1949 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 10, 12 and 15
AIR1984Cal268
Subrata Roy Chowdhury, ;J.C. Ghosh, ;Tapas Banerjee and ;Ashoke K. Sil, Advs.
ORDERP.C. Borooah, J.1. The petitioner Sm. Usha Uthup does not require any introduction to the music loving people of India and also in many countries abroad. By her songs numerous charities, including those under the Red...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: the India Electric Works Ltd.
Kolkata
Aug-27-1968
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 293(1), 439, 443, 443(1) and 529; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 21; ;Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 18E(1)
AIR1970Cal398
Subrata Roy Choudhury and ;R.N. Pyne, Advs. for Petitioning Creditor, ;N.G. Roy Choudhury, Adv. for ;Steel Distributors a supporting Creditor, ;A. Ganguli, Attorney for ;Anwar Ali and Co. one of the S
ORDERK.L. Roy, J.1. This is an application under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the Winding-up of the India Electric Works Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company). The petitioning creditor is the State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRemington Rand of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Collector of Central Exc ...
Kolkata
Jul-22-1981
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 2; ;Central Excise Rules - Rules 8, 8(1) and 10(1)
1981(8)ELT874(Cal)
Subrata Roy Chowdhury, Adv.
ORDERP.C. Borooah, J.1. The Petitioner No. 1 Remington Rand of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) having their registered and head office at 3, Council House Street, Calcutta, carries on business inter alia in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLokenath Gupta and ors. Vs. Credits Private Ltd.
Kolkata
Aug-18-1967
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 136, 167, 210, 220 and 439
[1968]38CompCas599(Cal),72CWN624
Subrata Roy Chowdhuri and ;Tapas Kumar Banerjee, Advs.
S.C. Ghose, J.1. This is an application made by Lokenath Gupta, Kanailal Agarwalla and Ramratan Panday, three directors of the Credits Private Limited, hereinafter referred to as the said company for an order for winding up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBritish Airways Vs. Art Works Export Ltd. and anr.
Kolkata
Jul-23-1985
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Carriage by Air Act, 1972 - Schedule - Article 30(1) and 30(2)
AIR1986Cal120,89CWN1117
Subrata Roy, ;Amalendu Mitra and ;Barun Kumar Goswami, Advs.
M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This application under Section 115 of the Civil P. C. filed at the instance of the defendant No. 1, British Airways, a Public Limited Company, is directed against Order No. 19 dt....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of Tokyo Ltd. Vs. Soorajmull Nagarmull and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-12-1979
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 52
AIR1980Cal118
S.K. Gupta, Adv. on behalf of ;D.K. Jalan, Adv. and others and supported ;Bachawat, Adv. ;P.K. Das, Adv. appeared on behalf of ;Mohan Lal Jalan, Adv. and supported ;Bachawat, Adv. ;Subrata Roy Chowdhu
ORDERPadma Khastgir, J.1. This application has been taken out by Bank of Tokyo Limited against Soorajmull Nagarmull, a firm, being defendant No. 1 and the other defendants as the partners of the said firm,2. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEscorts Limited Vs. Misrilal Properties Ltd.
Kolkata
Jul-17-1992
Tenancy
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 21(4A), 22, 22(1), 22(2) and 22(3); ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1969
(1993)1CALLT297(HC),96CWN1126
Subrata Roy, Adv.
Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. The subject-matter of challenge in the present, revisional proceedings is an order, dated 24th September, 1990, passed in Case Nos. C 18358 and C 18359, by the Rent Controller, on applications of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »