Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: subodh kumar · Page 1 of about 680 results (0.104 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 2003

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Cc ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2003

Subject : CivilExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 35H; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(88)ECC466; 2004(177)ELT71(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Srivastava, S.C. and ;Subodh Kumar, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J. 1. This Writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and order dated 5.12.2001 passed by respondent No. 2 The Customs, Excise & Cold (Control)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2004

Dinesh Kumar Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC1309

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Rajvanshi, ;M.K. Rajvanshi, ;P.C. Srivastava and ;Satish Mandhyan, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J. 1. Since common questions of law and facts and involved in both these writ petitions hence they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The writ petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1999

Suresh Chandra Gupta Vs. District Magistrate, Tilhar, Shahjahanpur and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipal Boards Service (Inquiry, Punishment and Termination of service) Rules - Rule 5(1)

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC1999; (1999)2UPLBEC1137

Advocate for Appellant : Subodh Kumar, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. The petitioner has been reverted from the post of Daftari to the post of peon by an order dated 11.5.1999 contained in Annexure-3 to the writ petition. This order has since been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 2005

Registrar of Companies Vs. Kamal Infosys Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 10(3), 439, 448 and 449; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1913; Income Tax Act, 1922; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1961; Patna High Court (Establishment of Permanent Bench at Ranchi) Act, 1976; ;Patna High Court Rules; Limitation Act - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 10; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 24; United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 - Schedule - Article 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas455(All); 2005(3)ESC1618; [2007]74SCL68(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Subodh Kumar and ;Umesh Chandra, Advs.

Dilip Gupta, J.1. A learned Judge of this Court has referred the following question to the Division Bench:-'Whether this company petition filed for winding up of the company (M/s. Kamal INFOSYS Ltd., Respondent No. 1) having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2000

Union of India and Another Vs. Super Gold Industries (India) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-03-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVII, Rule 5B - Order 276, Rule 5B

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC835

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Srivastava and ;Subodh Kumar, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The only point that has been urged by the learned counsel for the appellant that the learned trial court did not discharge its obligation as provided under Rule 5B of Order XXVII of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2002

Registrar of Companies Vs. Kamrao Plastique (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 24

Reported in : [2002]40SCL227(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Subodh Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Sri Subodh Kumar, additional standing counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Pandey on behalf of Sri Ajai Prakash.2. This company petition has been filed by Registrar of Companies U.P. and Uttaranchal at Kanpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2010

Atiqure Rahman. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 34

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Subodh Kumar, Adv.

1. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 21.11.2006 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence Vs. 1st Ad ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 29 and 37

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2827

Advocate for Appellant : Umesh Narain Sharma and ;Subodh Kumar, S.C.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. The controversy involved in all these writ petitions is identical and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.2. An area measuring 2221.12 acres in villages Pasonda. Karhera, Nistali, Aslatpur, Sikanderpur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1997

Arvind Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-28-1997

Subject : Labour and IndustrialTrusts and Societies

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees' Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 5; Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 121

Reported in : (1998)1UPLBEC163

Advocate for Appellant : Subodh Kumar and ;Subhash Kumar, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J.1. In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents in the nature of writ of mandamus to treat the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2004

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Mohd. Nayyar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2004

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 and 141 - Orders 9, Rules 3 and 13 - Order 22, Rules 3, 4 and 10A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 120 and 137

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3643

Advocate for Appellant : Subodh Kumar, Addl. S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Both the petitions have been tagged on by virtue of consideration of common issues involved in both the petitions. Reliefs sought in Writ Petition No. 47587 of 2003 may be quoted below :'(a)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial