Advanced Search Results

Jay Engineering Works Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Special Law; ;Indian Penal Code; ;Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 17 and 18; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 166(1), 166(3), 226 and 256; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54, 100, 127, 151, 154 and 157; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 141 - Order 1, Rule 1; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 57(3)

Reported in : AIR1968Cal407,72CWN440

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy and ;Milan Banerjee, Advs., ;Sankardas Banerjee, ;Sankar Ghosh and ;Shib Kumar Majumdar, Advs. In Civil Revn. No. 726 (W) of 1967, ;R.C. Deb, ;N.C. Chakraborty and ;Kanika Banerjee, Advs.,

Sinha, C.J.1. This application and anumber of other applications relate to a group of cases commonly described as 'gherao' cases. The expression 'gherao' is not entirely new, and already finds place in three Bengali dictionaries. But...

United Arab Republic and anr. Vs. Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 84, 86 and 87 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Government Trading Taxation Act, 1926 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1962Cal387

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy and ;P.K. Sen, Advs.

Lahiri, C.J. 1. This appeal raises two important questions about the immunity of a foreign Sovereign State from the civil process of the Courts of our country. The plaintiff respondent instituted a suit for recovery of...

New Churulia Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 80 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 7, Rule 7; ;Constitution of India - Article 299; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 65; ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 175(3)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal585

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy, Adv.

K.C. Das Gupta, C.J. 1. The main question for decision in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, who is the appellant before us, should be allowed to raise an issue as regards relief under Section 65...

Sk. Md. Soleman Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 25, 31 and 226; ;Calcutta Police Act, 1866 - Sections 35 and 39; ;Citizenship Act, 1955; ;Constitution (Declaration as to Foreign States) Order, 1950; ;Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 3; ;Foreigners Exemption Order, 1959

Reported in : AIR1965Cal312,1965CriLJ679

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy and ;M. Pal, Advs.

P.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment and order of Mr. Justice Binayak Nath Banerjee dismissing the petitioner's application for a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. The petitioner applied to this...

Bengal Agricultural and Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Corporation of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 23, Rule 1; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 2(26) and 2(26); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 3; ;Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 52; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49

Reported in : AIR1960Cal123

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy and ;Bhola Sen, Advs.

P.C. Mallick, J.1. This is a suit for a declaration of rights of the plaintiff under a contract with the defendant Corporation, injunction to prevent a breach thereof by the defendants, for damages andfor other reliefs....

Damodar Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 33; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 39 and 42; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : AIR1959Cal526

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy, ;S. Roy and ;Subrata Roy, Advs.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J. 1. This is an application under Section 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act to determine the existence of an arbitration agreement. 2. The petitioner is a contractor who submitted on 18-7-1952 a tender...

Albert Judah Judah Vs. Rampada Gupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 7, Rules 1 and 7 - Order 23, Rule 1(3) - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 34, 76(3), 78, 79, 79(2), 86 and 86F; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 65; ;Trusts Act, 1882 - Section 94; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 110, 166, 169, 290 and 293; ;Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 2(7); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106

Reported in : AIR1959Cal715,[1960]30CompCas582(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Chowdhary, ;Subimal Roy, ;Ajoy K. Basu and ;N.K. Banerjee, Advs.

P.C. Mallick, J.1. This is a suit in which the plaintiff seeks to establish his title to a bunch of 26752 ordinary shares in the defendant company. The Company and one Ramapada Gupta in whose name...

M.L. Dalmiya and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 115 and 120

Reported in : AIR1963Cal277

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy, ;A.C. Bhabra and ;Bachawat, Advs.

P.C. Mallick, J. 1. A special case has been stated by the arbitrator in the above arbitration proceedings for the opinion of the Court on a question of law. The question of' law referred is whether...

Ranjit Chandra Mitter Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 41

Reported in : AIR1963Cal594

Advocate for Appellant : Subimal Roy, ;A.C. Bhabra and ;Salil Roy Chowdhury, Advs.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application for injunction. The object is to restrain the Union of India from accepting a tender for works of any other Contractor in respect to which the petitioner alleges to...

Asiatic Society Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ318Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Subimal Roy. Learned Counsel

B.C. Mitra, J.1. In this application the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing an order dated 28 June 1964, and also for an order prohibiting the respondents from implementing the said...