Advanced Search Results

Mohamed Anwar Mohd. Yusuf Jiwa and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 25, 42 and 43; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100, 165 and 313

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR715; (1999)3BOMLR28

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Keswani and ;Subhash Jha, Advs.

ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Since these three appeals are arising out the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered in N.D.P.S. Special Case No. 59 of 1995 by the learned Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic...

Lata Ramesh More Vs. Ramesh Dinkar More and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

P.C. 1. All these matters are taken together for decision on the legal point to the following effect : âWhether under section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure an application for leave to file appeal can...

Deputy Superintendent of Police Vs. Ashoo Surendranath Tewari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mukesh Kumar Maroria

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.575 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) No.5422 OF2015 ASHOO SURENDRANATH TEWARI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EOW, CBI & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT...

Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

1. The applicant is accused no.1 in M.C.O.C. Special Case No.10 of 2012, pending before the Special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (hereinafter referred to as “M.C.O.C. Act”), Thane. There are totally...

Santhimadam Plantations and Agro Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)69SCL64SAT

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sounder Rajan

1. The appeal is taken up for final disposal with the consent of both parties.2. The appellant challenges the order passed by the Respondent on 2/7/2001 debarring the appellant from accessing the securities market for a...

Aakif Ateeque Nachan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Oral Order: 1 The applicant is one of the six accused - accused no.4 - in M.C.O.C. Special Case No.10 of 2012, pending before the Special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (hereinafter...

Rabia Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

P.C: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). 2. By this petition,...

Radhavallabh Dhoot Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)58SCL423SAT

2. The appellant was a non-executive director of Enbee Plantations Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "company") that had cheated many innocent investors. A regulation known as Securities & Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes)...

Jm Mutual Fund and Jm Capital Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)3CompLJ544SAT

1. Appeal is taken up with the consent of parties for final disposal.By consent of parties, common orders are passed.2. The appellants being aggrieved by the order of the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer of SEBI dated...

Beauty Garden and Resorts (P.) Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)60SCL469SAT

1. All these appeals are taken up for final disposal with the consent of parties.2. In all these appeals the appellants challenge the order of the respondent date 15-11-2002. The operative portion of the order reads...