Advanced Search Results
Obiliappa and Another Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, Kr ...
Chennai
Apr-07-2016
Criminal
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction and sentence made in S.C.No.60 of 2011 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri District, at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.N. Eranna Rao Vs. Vitta Dodda Hanumanthappa Subbayya Setty and Co. B ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-11-1959
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(2), 34 and 114
AIR1960AP331
G. Venkatrama Sastry, Adv.
Basi Reddy, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. The suit out of which this second appeal arises was brought by the plaintiff against the respondent, who was the defendant in the suit, for the recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Ayyanna Setty and Sons and ors. Vs. State of Mysore
Karnataka
Sep-04-1959
Sales Tax
Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18 and 18-A; Madras Local Boards Act - Sections 225; Indian Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 62; City Municipal Act; District Municipalities Act; Indian Income-tax Act - Sections 67; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9
[1961]12STC731(Kar)
V. Krishnamurthy, ;G. Sridharamurthy, ;K.R. Gopivallabha Iyengar and ;B. Venkata Rao, Advs.
Narayana Pai, J.1. All these appeals have been heard together for the reason that they involve certain common questions. They are also directed against three judgments of the learned District Judge of Bellary, all delivered on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kulusumbi Vs. Azeeza Begum
Karnataka
Aug-22-1986
Family
Mohammedan Law
ILR1986KAR4027; 1986(2)KarLJ388
Sridharamurthy, Adv. for ;H. Sbramanya Jois, Adv.
Nesargi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Bellary on 10-2-76 in O.S. No. 10/1966. The appellants are the defendants. The respondents are the plaintiffs.2. The undisputed facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.B. Nath and Others Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep by ...
Chennai
Apr-15-1999
Property
ESSO (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1974 -- Sections 5, 7 and 23; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 106 and 107; Constitution of India -- Articles 14, 31(2) and 254; Central Act, 1974; Central Act, 1976 -- Sections 11; Burma Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976 -- Sections 5(1) and 55; Income Tax Act, 1961; Mines Act, 1952 -- Sections 2 and 3; Nationalisation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 20, Rule 12; Registration Act, 1908; Indian Stamp Act, 1899
1999(2)CTC145
Mr. S. Gopalaratnam Senior Counsel for ;Mr. P. Veeraraghavan, Adv.
ORDER1. The plaintiffs in 6.S.No. 569 of 1979 on the filed of the VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, who have succeeded before the trial court and lost before the first appellate court are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.B. Nath and ors. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Represent ...
Chennai
Apr-15-1999
Property
(1999)3MLJ476
E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The plaintiffs in O.S. No. 569 of 1979 of the file of the VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, who have succeeded before the trial court and lost before the first appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›