Advanced Search Results
L.P. Naithani Vs. Commandant/D.S.C. Railway Protection Force and Other ...
Allahabad
May-08-1998
Civil
1998(3)AWC1863
V.B. Singh and ;T.P. Singh, Advs.
M. Katju and S.L. Saraf, JJ.1. Heard Shrl V. B. Singh and Shrl T. P. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Kumar, learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 1. 2 and 3, who has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Singh Negi Vs. Ramesh Chandra Tiwari
Uttaranchal
Dec-23-2004
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2005(1)ARC471
Anil Dabral, Adv.
Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Anil Dabral, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Joshi, Counsel for the respondent.2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 9th October,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonga Metals (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Jun-30-1999
Direct Taxation
1. This is an appeal by the assessee in which the assessee has challenged the assessment for the block period completed under the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Monga Metals (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Allahabad
Jun-30-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)67TTJ(All)247
S.K. Giarg, for the Assessee S. Chopra & V.B. Mishra, for the Revenue
ORDERI.S. Verma, J. M.This is an appeal by the assessee in which the assessee has challenged the assessment for the block period completed under the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.A.C. Commandant Iv Battalion Vs. Smt. Kavita Devi
Allahabad
Oct-12-2007
Motor Vehicles
2008(1)AWC91
Sri. S. K. Malhotra, Sri. Malhotra
Vijay Kumar Verma, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, the Judgment and award dated 25.8.1998, passed by M.A.C.T./13th Additional District Judge, Allahabad, in M.A.C.P. No. 311 of 1997, Kavita Devi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Kumar Anand and Others Vs. U. P. State Electricity Board, Luckn ...
Allahabad
Dec-20-2000
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16(4A), 73 and 162; U.P. Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1993 - Sections 3 (7); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 15, 27, 78A and 79; Constitution (Seventy Seventh Amendment) Act, 1995; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 - Sections 3(7)
2001(1)AWC490; (2001)1UPLBEC708
Pushkar Mehrotra and ;Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.
S. R. Singh, J.1. These petitions raise common question of law and being grounded on same set of facts were taken up together for convenient disposal by a common judgment. The petitioners of Writ Petition No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Kishun and ors. Vs. Hari Prasad and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-03-1952
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Land Act, 1934 - Sections 11(3); Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Secton 288(1) and 288(4)
AIR1953All575
Ambika Prasad, Adv.
Mushtaq Ahmad, J. 1. The appeal first mentioned was filed by the landlords-applicants against certain claimants in a case under the Encumbered Estates Act and the appeal next mentioned was filed by another, set of claimants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkhilesh Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. District Judge and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-07-2006
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 32, Rules 2 and 12 - Order 43, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Article 136
2006(2)AWC1983
Salil Kumar Rai, Adv.
Shishir Kumar, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the judgment and order dated 15.9.2000 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) passed by the District Judge, Gorakhpur, respondent No. 1 in Miscellaneous Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghuram Grah Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Chandra Mohan S ...
Allahabad
Dec-14-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132A, 132(8), 132(8)(1), 132(8)(1A), 142(1), 143(1), 143(2), 153A, 153C, 245C, 245D(1), 281B, 281B(1) and 281B(2); Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944; Indian Income tax Act, 1922; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94B
(2006)201CTR(All)268; [2006]281ITR147(All)
Rakesh Kumar, Adv.
Prakash Krishna, J.1. In the present petition challenge is to the legality, validity and propriety of the order passed Under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act, by means...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharthari Prasad Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Feb-15-2000
Service
Uttar Pradesh Fundamental (Financial Handbook, Volume 2, Parts II to IV) Rules - Rule 56; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officer (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 (J.O.R. Rules) - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 309, 310 and 311; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules 56 (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1970; Civil Service Regulations - Articles 465 and 465A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
2000(2)AWC1606
K.K. Roy, ;Ravi Kiran Jain, ;Ram Singh and ;Lokendra Kumar, Advs.
Palok Basu, J. 1. Shri Bharthari Prasad erstwhile member of the Higher Judicial Service of this State has challenged the order dated 27.11.98 passed by the State of U. P. compulsorily retiring him.2. When the writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »