Advanced Search Results
Committee of Management, Inter College and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ...
Allahabad
Aug-23-2004
ElectionConstitution
(2004)3UPLBEC3001
S.D. Shukla, Adv.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.D. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Sri P.C. Pathak, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 6 and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5.2. Committee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandeep Kumar Rathi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-29-2007
Trusts and Societies
2008(1)AWC662
Sri. P. C. Pathak
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record of the case and to quash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisan Crusher and Another Vs. Deputy Cane Commissioner, Meerut and Ano ...
Allahabad
May-03-1999
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 3 (1) and 3B; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Rules, 1961 - Rule 13A and 13A (1), (1A), (2), (3) and (4); Constitution of India - Article 226;
1999(3)AWC1854
V.K. Shukla and;P.C. Pathak, Advs.
M. C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order dated 30.12.1997 passed by the Khandsari Inspector-cum-Assessing Officer, Roorkee rejecting the petitioner's option made under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›