Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sri mohan shanthangoudar · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 2001

Sanjay G. Revankar Vs. State by Drug Inspector, Uttar Kannada District ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-15-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 119; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 34, 34(1) and 34(2); Criminal procedure Code , 1973 - Sections 154, 200 and 482

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1353; ILR2002KAR475; 2002(3)KarLJ304

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Bhagawan, ;B.L. Acharya and ;S.K. Venkata Reddy, Advs.

ORDERS.R. Bannurmath, J.1. Though these petitions pertain to number of accused in different criminal cases launched by the State of Karnataka represented by Drugs Inspector, Uttar Kannada District, Karwar, as the offence alleged against the accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1990

Lakshman Rao Sakharam Survase Vs. Smt. Mangala W/O Lakshman Rao Survas ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-07-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1980; ILR1991KAR637; 1990(3)KarLJ346

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M. Mahabaleswhar Goud, Adv.

ORDER1. The short point that falls for determination in this Criminal Petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. is whether in an application filed under section (3) of S. 125, Cr.P.C. by a person awarded maintenance under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1997

Smt. Parvathi Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Haveri Sub-division, Hav ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-11-1997

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 49; Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha) Rules, 1994 - Rules 3(1 and 2)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR3230; 1998(1)KarLJ399

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Mohan Shanthangoudar, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has challenged the notice calling for the meeting to consider no confidence motion against the petitioner in this petition.2. The petitioner is the elected Adhyaksha of Kuppellur Gram Panchayat. Some of the members...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 12 2001

State of Karnataka Vs. S.P. Devaraju

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 32

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT(Cri)27; 2001CriLJ3598; ILR2001KAR3983; 2001(4)KarLJ140

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Mohan Shanthangoudar, State Public Prosecutor

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. The State of Karnataka has, through this appeal assailed the order of acquittal recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hassan, in Sessions Case No. 54 of 1988. By judgment and order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2000

State of Karnataka Vs. Angadi Siddappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-03-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 320, 324 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377(1) and (3)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR1465; 2000(4)KarLJ247

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Mohan Shanthangoudar, State Public Prosecutor

1. Interesting aspect of the law relating to the acceptability of expert evidence has fallen for determination in this criminal appeal. The short issue is as to whether, in the face of opinion evidence tendered by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2000

State of Karnataka Vs. Shankar and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1917; II(2000)DMC43; 2000(2)KarLJ61

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Mohan Shanthangoudar, State Public Prosecutor

ORDERM.F. Saldanha, J. This is one more of the distressing wife-burning cases where the allegation was that due to the non-return of the gold ring and the harassment and cruelty meted out to the deceased wife...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial