Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sri b veerabhadrappa · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.170 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1988

Channabasamma Vs. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-27-1988

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 - Rules 2(15), 5 and 6

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1285; 1989(3)KarLJ485

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for quashing the order dated 26-2-1976 passed by the Tahsildar, Bhadravathi and the order dated 9-11-1978 passed by the Karnataka...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1985

M. P. Jayaraj Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-25-1985

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; Criminal Procedure code - Sections 428; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1460

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

ORDERK. A. Swami, J.1. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Government Order dated 12-11-1984 bearing No. HD 87 PRR 84, produced as Annexure-E. He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1992

Mohanraj Vs. Violet Chandra

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : II(1992)DMC5; ILR1992KAR846; 1992(2)KarLJ269

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

Venkatachala, J. 1. This Appeal is preferred under Section 39 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (for short 'the Act'), against the order dated 13.9.1991 made by the Court of Civil Judge, K.G.F. (for short 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1990

University of Mysore Vs. P. Maribasavaradya

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(7), 2(8) and 50

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3671; 1990(3)KarLJ468

Advocate for Appellant : N. Devadas, Adv. for Kesvy & Co.

Shivaraj Patil, J.1. The facts briefly stated, necessary for disposal of these appeals, are these:-2. The Oriental Research Institute is one of the non-teaching Institutions of the Mysore University. The 1st respondent joined the said Institute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1998

Erappa Vs. Channabasappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-18-1998

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 14 and 15(1) ; Constitution of India - Article 215; Karnataka Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1972 - Sections 17; Indian Trust Act - Rule 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Muzrai Act

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2421; ILR1999KAR76; 1999(6)KarLJ278

Advocate for Appellant : Sri S. Siddappa, Adv.

Chidananda Ullal, J.1. The complainant in the above contempt petition was the defendant 1 in O.S. No. 134 of 1985 on the file of the Munsiff, Tarikere, whereas the respondent was the plaintiff 1, being the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1986

Management of Sri Siddaganga Training College Vs. Shivanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-03-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 - Sections 6

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

ORDERDoddakale Gowda, J.1. By impugned order, dated 11th December 1981, second respondent has set aside the order made by petitioner on 30-9-1975 dismissing first respondent from service.2. Main contention of Sri B. Veerabhadrappa, Learned Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1995

Ranganna Vs. Chikkanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-11-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 115

Reported in : ILR1996KAR491; 1996(5)KarLJ325

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been preferred by the defendants challenging the order dated: 7.7.1995, whereby, the Trial Court has granted the leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1994

Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Selection of Conditates for Admission to Engineering, Medical, Dental, Pharmacy and Nursing Rules, 1993 - Rule 3(1)

Reported in : ILR1995KAR282; 1995(1)KarLJ675

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa

ORDERSadashiva, J 1. The Petitioner has presented this Petition for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider his application for allotment of a free seat in first year B.E. (Mechanical) for the academic year...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1986

Venkatalakshamma Vs. Sub-inspector of Police, Chikkamagalur and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-07-1986

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1964 - Sections 48-A(l)

Reported in : AIR1987Kant79; ILR1987KAR1180

Advocate for Appellant : B.Veerabhadrappa, Adv.

Puttaswamy, J. 1. This appeal is by the appellant who was the petitioner and is directed against the order dt. 13-11-1981 of Doddakale Gowda, J. rejecting her writ petition No. 27137 of 1981 at the preliminary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1993

B.N. Raghuram Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-07-1993

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise Licenses (General Conditions) Rules, 1967 - Rules 2 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 71(2) and 71(3)

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2332; 1993(3)KarLJ235

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Datar, Senior Adv., ;P.V. Shetty, ;B. Veerabhadrappa, ;G.K. Bhat and ;O.S. Bhat, Advs.

ORDERShivaraj Patil, J. 1. All these Writ Petitions are taken up for final hearing with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and the learned Advocate General for the State. They are heard...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial