Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: somesh khare · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 2000

Nabbu Khan Vs. Iiird Additional District Judge, Pilibhit and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 141 - Order 21, Rules 35, 37, 57, 97, 98, 100 and 103; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2667; 2000AIHC(All)4470

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Bhalla and ;Somesh Khare, Advs.

D. K. Seth, J.1. After hearing Mr. R. N. Bhalla and Mr. Somesh Khare for the applicants and Mr. S. A. Gilani, be an order dated 18th July, 2000. was dictated in open court disposing of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2005

Kanti Swarup Sharma S/O Shri Om Prakash, Sr. Toa(P) and ors. Vs. Union ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 14(4), 309 and 335; Constitution of India (82nd Amendment) Act, 2000; Junior Telecom Officer Recruitment Rules, 1996 - Rule 7

Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC1720

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Singh and ;Somesh Khare, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Somesh Khare for petitioners and Sri B.N. Singh, learned . counsel for Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and other respondents. 2. All the petitioners are serving as Senior Telecom Operating Assistant (Senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1998

In Re: Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-1998

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas332(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Khare and ;Somesh Khare, Advs. for TAFCO Officers' Association, ;S.C. Budhwar, Adv. assisted by ;Yashwant Varma, Adv., ;Narendra Mohan, Adv. for TAFCO Janta Mazdoor Union and ;Sandeep Saxena, Ad

A.K. Banerji, J.1. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR in short) had vide its order dated February 14, 1995, recommended the winding up of the company Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited ('TAFCO'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 30 2003

Anil Kumar Agarwal and anr. Vs. U.P. Stock Exchange Association Ltd. a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-30-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC280; [2004]53SCL119(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Somesh Khare, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders dated 8.10.2003 and 15.10.2003 (Annexures-5 and 7) passed by the respondents imposing a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh and not to hear the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2001

Kesh Dutt Pandey Vs. Senior Regional Manager, F.C.i. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-03-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226; Food Corporation of India Staff Regulations, 1971 - Regulations 54, 67 and 68; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1965 - Rules 22 and 23

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1546; (2001)2UPLBEC1364

Advocate for Appellant : Somesh Khare, Adv.

Yatindra Singh, J.1. The writ petition involves with the Interpretation of Regulations 67 and 68 of the Food Corporation of IndiaStaff Regulations. 1971 (the Regulations). The question is whether an appeal lies against the order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2000

Jaswant Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1084

Advocate for Appellant : L.P. Naithani, ;Amrendra Nath Singh, ;A.N. Tripathi, ;B.D. Mandhyan, ;Somesh Khare, ;P.K. Sinha and ;Ashok Bhushan, Advs.

M. Katju and D.R. Chaudhary,JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel.2. In this writ petition as well as in connected Writ Petition No. 37304 of 1999, the petitioners have prayed for a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1996

Ravindra and Co. Vs. Cegat

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-18-1996

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(98)ELT305(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Somesh Khare, Adv., i/b., ;Ashok Khare, Adv.

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges an order dated 16-7-1996, copy of which is Annexure '7' to the writ petition. The said order reads as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

Dr. (Smt.) Shashi Prateek Vs. Charan Singh Verma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All109; 2009(1)AWC212

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M.K. Gupta, Sri. M. K. Gupta

Sabhajeet Yadav, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 3.9.2008 passed by. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar purporting to be as Lok Adalat in Misc. Case No. 57 of 2007, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2008

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava S/O Ram Bali Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-17-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC239(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Siddharth Singh

V.M. Sahai and Pankaj Mithal, JJ.1. Under challenge in this special appeal is the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated 29.4.2007 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3790 of 2004, Rajesh Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2014

M/S. Uniword Telecom Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2014

Subject : Education

Ashok Bhushan, J. These two writ petitions filed by the same petitioners have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in Writ Petition No.48250/2013, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial