Advanced Search Results

B.P. Singh and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand Through C.B.i.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 406, 407, 409 and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 205 and 438

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR138(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Sidharth Shankar Ray, Sr. Adv. and; Delip Jerath,; Mrina

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Sidharath Shankar Ray, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Opposite Party.2. The petitioners, who are all senior officers of M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation...

Raj Kumar Johri and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 11A, 18 and 28A; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2002SC1519; 2002(2)AWC1398(SC); JT2002(3)SC340; (2002)2MLJ192(SC); RLW2002(2)SC343; 2002(3)SCALE17; (2002)3SCC732; [2002]2SCR512; (2002)2UPLBEC1538

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray and; U.N. Bachawat, Sr. Advs.,; Sushil Kumar Jain,;

ORDER1. In September, 1977 for acquisition of more than 600 hectares of land, a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act') was issued for the purpose of development of Ujjain,...

Hindustan Club Ltd. Vs. Pawan Kumar Jain

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 211, 216, 217, 227(3), 274, 274(1) and 642; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000; ;Election Rules - Rule 5; ;Companies Rules, 2003 - Rules 4 and 9; ;Constitution of India - Article 173

Reported in : [2005]64SCL65(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Sidharth Shankar Ray, ;P.C. Sen and ;Siddhartha Mitra, Advs.

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. This application arising out of an order dated 29-4-2005 (See Pawan Jain v. Hindustan Club Ltd. [2005] 5 Comp. LJ 1/62 SCL 210 (Cal.)) whereby His Lordship was pleased to direct the...

State of Jharkhand and Tenughat Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar a ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR589b(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Sidharth Shankar Ray, Sr. Adv.,; Debi Pal and; Delip Jer

1. We heard these cases on 12th and 13th August, 2004 and then resumed hearing on 19.8.2004 and contitiued the hearing on 20th August, 2004 and 23rd August, 2004. This morning, when the arguments were to...

In Re: Gontermann-piepers (India) Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 22, 22(1) and 81(1A); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 100 to 103 and 391 to 394

Reported in : [2005]57SCL225(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : Sidharth Shankar Ray,; Gautam Mitra,; Ranjan Deb,;

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This petition under Sections 391 to 394 read with Section 81 (1 A) and Sections 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Gontermann-Piepers (India) Limited with its...