Advanced Search Results

Nandlal Yadav Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 376

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2184; 2002(2)MPHT144

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Datt, Sr. Adv. and ;Sidharth Datt, Adv.

U.N. Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and findings recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh, in the Sessions Trial No. 112/87, whereby the accused/appellant was convicted of offences under Sections 376...

Dr.Parafula Moon Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sidharth Datt

C.R.R.No.329/2009 16.8.2012 Shri Manish Datt, Sr.Counsel with Shri Sidharth Datt, Counsel for the applicant. Shri Akshay Namdeo, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard Finally. This petition under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.has been filed to quash the...

Kailash Khande Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sidharth Datt

W.P.No.13920/2013 Kailash Khande vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 30.08.2013 Heard Shri Sidharth Datt, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by...

Bhairam Savner Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sidharth Datt

W.P.No.13921/2013 Bhairam Savner vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 30.08.2013 Heard Shri Sidharth Datt, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by...

Lakhanlal Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, Panchayat and Rural ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Writ Petition No.20824/2012 Lakhanlal Ahirwar versus State of MP and others 14.12.2012. Shri Sidharth Datt and Shri Ajay Mishra for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for the respondents on advance notice. Matter pertains to...

Yagya Narayan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 363, 36;

1. This petition for issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus, has been filed by Yagya Narayan Dwivedi, alleging that his niece Ms.Sushma Dwivedi has been illegally detained by respondent no5 Neeraj Shukla.  An FIR Annexure P-1...

Bhagwat Singh Vs. B.S. Chouhan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Bhagwat Singh versus B.S.Chouhan and another. 20.11.2012. Shri Sidharth Datt for the applicant. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for the respondents. Keeping in view the nature of order passed by the writ court and the fact...

Kishun Bediya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT309

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Datt, Sr. Adv. and ;Sidharth Datt, Adv.

S.K. Kulshrestha, J. 1. Aggrieved by his conviction, the appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 15-5-1998 of the learned Sessions Judge, Panna in Sessions Trial No. 58/1997, by which, the learned Sessions Judge...

Sunderlal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT571; 2002(3)MPLJ125

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Datt and ;Sidharth Datt, Advs.

1. Appellant Sunderlal stands convicted under Section 302, IPC, with sentences of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1000/-, vide impugned judgment dated 21-2-90 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Raisen in Sessions Trial No....

Brijmohan Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100, 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT165

Advocate for Appellant : Sidharth Datt, Adv.

ORDERRajeev Gupta, J. 1. Appellant Brijmohan stands convicted under Section 302, IPC with sentence of imprisonment for life, vide impugned judgment dated 23-10-90 passed by Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad, in S.T. No. 90/90.2. Appellant Brijmohan has been...