Advanced Search Results

State of H.P. Vs. Vinod Kumar

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 308; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162(2) and 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3134

Advocate for Appellant : Shyama Dogra, Deputy Adv. General

Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the acquittal of accused Vinod Kumar by Sessions Judge, Hamirpur in Sessions Case No. 8 of 1989, dated April 30, 1990 for offence under Section 302, Indian Penal...

State of H.P. Vs. Raj Kumar and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380 411, 414 and 457; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 313

Reported in : 1994CriLJ894

Advocate for Appellant : Shyama Dogra, Adv. General

D.P. Sood, J.1. Sometimes selfishness and greed override the religious faith and spiritual morale of a human being. Even greed has not spared the Almighty 'Lord Vishnoo', who is the Creator of the Universe.2. Chamba is...

State of H.P. Vs. Diwana and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3002

Advocate for Appellant : Shyama Dogra, Deputy Adv. General

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the acquittal of accused Diwana (A-1), Suffal alias Subhash (A-2), Prithi (A-3), Adalti (A-4) and Sukhia (A-5), by the Session Judge Kangra Division at Dharamsala in Sessions...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Madan Mohan

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 511; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3845

Advocate for Appellant : Shyama Dogra, Deputy Adv. General

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Accused Madan Mohan was tried for an offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and having been convicted, was sentenced to undergo 3 years' rigorous imprisonment and to pay a...

Bhupinder Singh Vs. Smt. Kanchan Rani

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 25

Reported in : AIR2001HP16,II(2000)DMC365

Advocate for Appellant : Shyam Dogra, Adv.

Kuldip Chand Sood. J. 1. This appeal under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', is directed against the judgment of the Senior Sub-Judge. Solan, District Solan (exercising...

Jagdish Rai Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Government of India, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Subject : Education

Honourable Mrs. Shyama Dogra, Member(J) 1. Heard learned proxy counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has challenged the impugned order of termination of his services as Part Time Chowkidar vide Annexure A-1, dated 21.07.2011, without...

Raj Mohammad and anr. and Gulzar Ali Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 150

Reported in : 1995CriLJ810

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Adv.in both the appeals

Bhawani Singh, J. 1. We propose to decide both these criminal appeals (Cr. Appeal No. 21 of 1992 and Cr! Appeal No. 22 of 1992) by this judgment since they arise out of the same judgment...

Mauji Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 32(1) and 145; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 154, 154(1), 156, 162, 162(1) and 162(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3662

Advocate for Appellant : Kuldip Singh, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Sessions Judge, Sirmaur, in Sessions trial No. 27-N/7 of 1991, dated 24-9-1992. The accused has been convicted for an offence under Section 302 of the...

H.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Charan Singh and Company

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 30 and 33

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR659(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Kaushik, Adv.

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. 1. This appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') has been preferred by the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd.--defendant herein against the judgment dated...

Chanderwati Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh Through Its Financial Secre ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Subject : Education

Oral: MRS. SHYAMA DOGRA, MEMBER (J): 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 10.2.2012, to expedite the matter, without awaiting for reply from the respondents, they were directed to produce the relevant record...