Advanced Search Results

Faijan Rizvan Khan Ages: 27 Years,and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489-C and 489-D read with Section 34, ; Right to Information Act (RTI) (R.I) - Section 489-C

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Shyam Mehta,Adv.

1. The appellants, who were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Sessions Case No. 250 of 2003, have by this Appeal, challenged their conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 489-C and 489-D read with Section...

Seagate Trading and Investment (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Vora and Vora and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR406

Advocate for Appellant : Shyam Mehta, ;Ayaz Bilawala and ;Bhushan Sakpal, Advs. i/b., Bilwala & Co.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The plaintiffs have prayed for a decree against the defendants as under;that the defendants be jointly and severally ordered and decreed to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of Rs. 25,62,191.78 as per...

Onkar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 11 and 184; Navy (Ceremonial Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations, 1963 - Regulations 268(1) and 269; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations (Navy), 1964 - Regulations 78 and 79

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR247

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Bhatkal, ;P.L. Naik and ;Shyam Mehta, Advs., i/b., ;Satendra Kumar, Adv. in W.P. No. 2289 of 2000

A.P. Shah, J.1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution involve common question relating to the right to receive pension and since this question is common to all the writ petitions, they are being...

Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai Vs. Joint Venture Angerlehner Mich ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 37, 85(1) and 85(2); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles 1, 3 and 13; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8 and 8(1); Arbitration Act, 1940; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Constitution of India; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rule 28

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR540

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Shankar Samudrala, Adv. in Arbit.P. No. 2/2007 and ;Shyam Mehta, Adv., i/b., ;J. Sagar, Adv. Associ. in Arbit.P. No. 310/2007

Karnik D.G., J.1. In all these petitions arising under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Arbitration Act, 1996'), an objection has been raised either by the office or by the...

Putzmeister Concrete Pumps Gmbh and Anr vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 22.12.2025% Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026 + LPA 1185/2024, CM APPL. 71163/2024 & CM APPL. 75920/2024 PUTZMEISTER CONCRETE PUMPS GMBH AND ANR ...Appellants Through: Mr.Jayant...

Bank of Baroda versus Farooq Ali Khan & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.687

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Srideepa Bhattacharyya, Ms. Neha Shivhare, M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 687 : 2025 INSC 253 Bank of Baroda v. Farooq Ali Khan & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 2759 of 2025) 20 February 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Manoj Misra, JJ.] Issue for Consideration...

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Ministry of Information a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging orders revoking their registration...

Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shyam Mehta, Shri. Shyam Mehta

1. Noticing unusual price movement in the scrip of Padmini Technologies Limited (for short Padmini), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter called the Board) ordered investigations with a view to ascertain the role of...

Sailesh Developers, a Registered Partnership Firm and Mr. Ramesh Bhava ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 31A, 32, 34, 35, 36, 36(1), 37, 38, 39, 41A to 41E, 50, 50A, 51, 59, 73 and 73A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Bombay Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 36; Maharashtra Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1971; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887; Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1); Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 25 and 26; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rules 2, 7, 7A and 24; O.S. High Court Rules - Rule 28; Constitution of India - Articles 26, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR100; 2007(3)BomCR7

Advocate for Appellant : D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Counsel, ;M.S. Doctor and ;D.G. Rangras, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 1641 of 2005, ;Ajit Kapadia and ;Aditya Chitale, Advs., i/b., Purohit and ;Purohit, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 7

1. A Division Bench of this Court (Coram Smt. Ranjana Desai and Abhay S. Oka, JJ) found that there was a divergence of opinion between two Division Benches of this Court as regards powers of Charity...

Union of India, Represented by the Secretary Vs. the Company Law Board ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Oral Judgment: 1. The Appellant - Union of India, represented by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, through the Regional Director, Western Region, has filed the present Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the...