Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shruti pandey · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 30 2018

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt Meenakshi Devi Avaru

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-30-2018

Subject : Direct Taxation

1/113 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF AUGUST2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.T.A.No.1/2015 C/W W.T.A.No.2/2015, W.T.A.No.3/2015, W.T.A.No.4/2015, W.T.A.No.5/2015, W.T.A.No.6/2015, W.T.A.No.3/2014, W.T.A.No.1/2014 & W.T.A.No.2/2014...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2026

Tata International Singapore Pte Limited vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 228/2024, I.A. 42520/2024 (b/o Respondent for modification of order dated 31.07.2024), I.A. Respondent for modification of order dated 06.11.2024), I.A. Outstanding Amount ), I.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2000

M.P. Umesh Chandra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)656; 85(2000)DLT111; 2000(53)DRJ403

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Jose Vergese, Adv

K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- 'It is, thereforee, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Courtmay graciously be pleased to:- (a) pass an order to quash and set aside the impugned letter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 23 2018

Patliputra Credit and Securities Ltd vs.prakash Chandra Yadav & An ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-23-2018

Subject : Education

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.P.A. 53/2013 #16 PATLIPUTRA CREDIT AND SECURITIES LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate versus PRAKASH CHANDRA YADAV & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1996

State of Haryana and Others Vs. O.P. Gupta, Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-1996

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Haryana Service Engineers Class-II Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1970 - Rule 9

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)978; AIR1996SC2936; [1996(73)FLR1290]; JT1996(3)SC141; 1996(1)SCALE602; (1996)7SCC533; [1996]1SCR468; 1996(1)LC339(SC); (1996)2UPLBEC1440

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Kumar Gupta,; Shruti Pandey and; Indu Malhotra,

1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the counsel on both sides. The controversy runs on a very narrow thread.3. Admittedly, the respondents were working in Haryana Service Engineers, Class II Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch). They...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1996

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-1996

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)15; [1996(74)FLR1930]; JT1996(5)SC633; 1996(4)SCALE448; (1996)9SCC209; [1996]Supp1SCR630; (1997)1UPLBEC459

Advocate for Appellant : Shruti Pandey and; Indu Malhotra, Advs

ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted3. Heard learned Counsel on both sides.4. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana made on July 14,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2007

Mrs. Shipra Chatterjee Vs. Siddharth Chatterjee

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 13B(1); Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13, Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : I(2007)DMC360; 2007(94)DRJ420

Advocate for Appellant : Shruti Pandey, Adv

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. Instant appeal arises out of an order dated 7th June, 2002 of the Learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, dismissing the appellant's applications under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and under Section 5 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

H.C. Bakshi S/O Shri Ram Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Right to Information

1. The applicant has claimed the following relief in the OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: (i) Declare that the constitution of the enquiry committee in the instant case is bad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

State Bank of India & Ors. versus the Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2039

[2024] 11 S.C.R. 2039 : 2024 INSC 852 State Bank of India & Ors. v. The Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch & Anr. (Civil Appeal No(s). 5023-5024 of 2024) 07 November...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial