Advanced Search Results

Premchand Somchand Shah Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1991(52)ELT231(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.R. Vahanvati,;Mr. Vikram Nankani and;Ms. Fardana Madan, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. Wadia Chandy & Co.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. If at all there was any field of controversy, it has been reduced drastically on account of admitted position that all the questions involved in this proceeding are practically decided by various pronouncements...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Ambarnath Bapusaheb Gade and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 and 378; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4445

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Shringarpure, APP

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. A. M. Shringarpure, App for the Appellant - State and Mr. b. P. Abhale for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 / Original Accused2. This is an Appeal filed by the...

Kashinath Ramchandra Patil and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 103, 105 and 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 100, 302, 307, 324, 504 and 506

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)1; (2001)1BOMLR282; 2001CriLJ4874; 2001(1)MhLj87

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.P. Mundergi, ;Mr. Ganesh Gole and ;Mr. R.V. More, Advs. and ;Mr. A.M. Shringarpure, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts and a common impugned Judgment we are disposing them off by one judgment. 2. Through Criminal Appeal No. 108 of 1996...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Narendra Jaywant Dudang

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 57, 375, 376 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 28, 313 and 378(1); Bombay Children Act

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)140

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.M. Shringarpure, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal preferred under section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. the State of Maharashtra impugns the Judgment and order dated 20/8/ 1985 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Greater Bombay in Sessions Case...

Arun Vinayak Gharkar, Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 399

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)120; 2004CriLJ1053

Advocate for Appellant : Rohini Wagh, Adv.;Shringarpure, APP

J.G. Chitre, J.1. The appellants are hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1995 wherein...

Sau. Rabu Ismail Pathan Vs. Raju Jaysingh Bhise and the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 366 and 376

Reported in : 2004CriLJ741

J.G. Chitre, J. 1. The petitioner absent. None present for her. Respondent No. 1 absent. None present for him. Shri Shringarpure, Additional Public Prosecutor, present for the State of Maharashtra, who happens to be protecting the...

Gangadhar Dattatraya Sule Vs. the C.K.P. Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 88

Reported in : AIR1973Bom186; (1972)74BOMLR814; (1972)9CompLJ20(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : M.B. Chitre and ;V.S. Kohojkar, Advs.

Desai, J. 1. In this petition, under Art, 227 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the correctness of the order of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Tribunal in Appeal No. 52 of 1966 dated July 8,...

D. Navinchandra and Co. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1991LC386(Bombay); 1989(43)ELT266(Bom)

A.C. Agarwal, J.1. The Petitioners along with two other parties viz. M/s. B. Vijaykumar & Co. and M/s. Star Diamond Company (India) had challenged the order dated 30-10-1986 of confiscation and the fine levied in lieu...

Indian Lead Private Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : 1989(19)ECC209; 1989(23)LC561(Bombay); 1988(38)ELT23(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F.H.J. Talyarkhan, ;A. Shroff, Adv. i/b., Smetham Byrne Lambert and Dubash, Advs.

Ashok Agarwal, J.1. The short point that arises for determination in this appeal relates to the construction of the Notification No. 33/81, dated the 1 st March 1981 issued under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of...

Fateh Mohamad Gulmohammed Sayed Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 397, 457 and 506

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3586

Advocate for Appellant : Zakir Husain, ;Naveen Chomal and ;Latika Khemani, Advs.

J.G. Chitre, J. 1. These appeals are being decided by common judgment as they arise from Sessions Case No. 886 of 1995. Smt. Latika Khemani is appearing for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 575 of...