Advanced Search Results

R.M. Solanki Vs. the State of Gujarat and 5 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 365, 294(b), 114; Arms Act 1959; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C.) - Section 482; Constitution of India - Article 226; Narcotics Act; Oaths Act 1969; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Brahmbhatt

1. In the above-mentioned group of cases, Special Criminal Application No. 445/2005 and Special Criminal Application were argued as lead matters. It would therefore, be useful to note in brief the background leading to the said...

Paramjit Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 18, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 41(3), 42, 42(1), 43, 44, 50, 50(1), 50(3), 51, 52, 52(2), 52(3), 52(4), 52A(2), 52A(4), 53, 57 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 109, 164, 165 and 313; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(38); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 135; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : 2000CriLJ100

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv.,; V.P. Bishnoi and; V.R. Bajwa,

Arun Madan, J. 1. Appellants have preferred this criminal appeal against the judgment dated 21-11-98 passed by the learned Special Judge NDPS Cases, Bundi in Sessions/ Criminal Case No. 190/98; whereby each of the appellants has...

Solomon Antony and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Disposal in Auction Rules - Rule 8; Abkari Act - Sections 17 and 18; Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Amendment Rules 1993 - Rule 8; Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules 1974

Reported in : AIR2001SC1395; 2001(75)ECC718; JT2001(3)SC100; 2001(2)SCALE177; (2001)3SCC694; [2001]2SCR53

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Joseph Vellapalli,; P. Krishn

ORDERRajendra Babu, J.1. For the excise year 1992-93 the State had monopoly in the matter of supply of arrack. The privilege of vending the arrack was obtained through a licence and the licensees got their supply...

Shri NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN161

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dt. 29.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition of the appellants challenging the judgment of the Assistant Collector, Jaipur dt. 10.04.1992 and the Board...

Krishna C. Mathur Vs. the University of Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1980WLN22

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mridul, Shri. H.M. Parekh

S.C. Agrawal, J.1. Dr. Krishna C. Mathur, the petitioner, in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, is employed as lecturer in the Department of Chemistry in the University of Jodhpur (hereinafter referred...

Krishna S/O Panchamrao Khopade Vs. Satish S/O Jhaulal Chaturvedi and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 30, 31, 33, 33(1), 34, 36, 36(2), 36(4), 77, 77(1), 77(2), 77(3), 78, 80, 83(1), 100(1), 103, 123(1) and 123(6); Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 14; Representation of the People (3rd Amending) Act, 2002 - Sections 33A, 33B and 75A; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 90; Conduct of Elections (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 19(1); Constitution of India - Articles 32, 84, 102, 141, 142, 145(3), 173, 191, 246, 286, 324, 327, 329; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR96

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Ghare, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. This is an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 by an elector challenging the election of the returned candidate from 134-Nagpur East Legislative Assembly Constituency. 2. The...

Arulmigu Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam Vs. the Hindu Religious and Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(20), 6(18), 46(iii), 55, 27, 116(2), 86; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions (Officers and Servants) Service Rules, 1964 - Rules 14, 5-A; Constitution of India - Section 226

Advocate for Appellant : Shri.R.Krishnamoorthy, Adv.

This Writ Petition is a third round of litigation between the priests and the employees on the one hand and Arulmigu Shri Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam represented by its Hereditary Trustee on the other hand over the fixation...

K.P. Sugandh Limited and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Food Adulteration

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1830; 2008(3)MPHT29(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Parag Kotecha

Dhirendra Mishra, J.1. The petitioners of these two writ petitions have questioned the legality, correctness and constitutional validity of the order dated 31-12-2007 passed by the Controller, Food and Drugs Administration and Food (Health) Authority, Chhattisgarh...

Udayanath Barik and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989CriLJ2216

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Das

ORDERA. Pasayat, J.1. This revision application under Sections 397/401 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') has been filed by sixteen petitioners, who along with two others,...

Bhaskar Cable Network Vs. Zee Turner Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. J.K. Pillay

1. The petitioner has filed this review petition (R.A. 7 of 2007) for review of Order of this Tribunal dated 15.5.2007 under Section 16(f) read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure and Order XLVII...