Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri walawalkar · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 21 1994

Vasant Rajaram Narvekar, Since Deceased by His Legal Heirs Vs. Ankusha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-21-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 61, 102 and 114; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6 and 123; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 19

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR196

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Rane and; Madhav Jamdar, Advs.

S.D. Pandit, J.1. Shri Vasant Rajaram Narvekar, the original plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 71 of 1975 on the file of Civil Judge Junior Division. Malvan. District - Sindhudurga has preferred this Second Appeal against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1993

Gangabai W/O Bala Kada by Jer Jeors and Legal Representative Vs. Jagan ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR321

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Rane, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. Gangabai Kadam, an aged widow (since deceased) filed a civil suit in the year 1976 for (i) a declaration of title to half portion of the house property where she was residing and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Shri Parshuram Prabhakar Uparkar Vs. Shri Tukaram Bhagwan Barde and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4 and 4(1); Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rule 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR501; 2006(5)MhLj598

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Walawalkar, Sr. Adv. and ;S. Prabhu, Adv.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Rule2. Learned Counsel for the Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable and heard forthwith so as to decide both the petitions at the stage of admission. 3. By these petitions, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 17 1999

Raman Wasudev Walawalkar Vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 3, 8, 9 and 13

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR243; 2000(2)BomCR552; (2000)1BOMLR618; 2000(3)MhLj192

Advocate for Appellant : Sharon D'sa i/b. ;Bhatt & ;Saldanha, Adv. and ;A.M. Vernekar, Adv. with ;Sudeep Dasgupta i/b. ;Narichania & Narichania

ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. This is a reference made by the learned arbitrator under the provisions of section 13(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The question that has been submitted for the opinion of the Court is'Can...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1993

Procter and Gamble India Limited and anr. Vs. the Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR403

Advocate for Appellant : A. Hidayatullah and ;V.S. Nankani, Advs., i/b., Desai, Berjis & Chinoy

A.V. Savant, J.1. The first petitioner Procter & Gamble India Limited is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The second petitioner is its shareholder. By this petition, the petitioners seek to challenge the letter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 1983

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Harilal Govindji and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-06-1983

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 146, 147, 148, 203, 209, 209(1), 209(2), 209(4) and 212

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR625; (1983)85BOMLR586

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Walawalkar, ;M.V. Shetty and ;P.B. Karhadkar, Advs.

S.N. Khatri, J.1. This is an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, against the decree of the learned Bombay City Civil Court Judge (Shri H. Suresh), granting certain declarations and injunctions against the Corporation,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1986

State of Maharashtra Vs. Parshuram Laxman Chalke

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 376

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR10

Advocate for Appellant : R.T. Walawalkar, Sr. Adv. (appointed) and ;M.D. Naik, Adv. (appointed);M.D. Gangakhedkar, P.P.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. Brevity is no doubt the laudable virtue of a judgment. However, that such a frame must contain within the necessary requirements of law is equally essential. Such details must reflect the blend of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1982

M. Vijayan Vs. Lajpatrai G. Jasani

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-1982

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR135

Advocate for Appellant : R.T. Walawalkar and ;M.J. Divwalla, Advs.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. The suit premises consist of a small garage located on Telang Road in Matunga area of this metropolitan city. The respondent herein claims to be the tenant of the suit premises and he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1993

Pandurang Narayan Deshmukh and anr. Vs. Anjirabai Parvati Gujar Since ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1993

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR683; (1993)95BOMLR195

Advocate for Appellant : P.L. Naik and ;M.A. Rane, Advs.

Bhimrao N. Naik, J.1. This is a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution which seeks to challenge the judgment and decree passed by the learned Asstt. Judge, Satara on 5th July, 1982 in Regular...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2001

Nepc Airlines and ors. Vs. CaptaIn Yashoo Vijay Parmar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33C(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR143; 2002(1)BomCR398; [2001(90)FLR217]

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Walawalkar and ;G.R. Kinkhabwala, Advs., i/b ;Mulla and Mulla

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Central Government Labour Court No. II, Mumbai on 30-7-1998 in Application No. LC-2/44 of 1997 filed by the applicant employee, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial