Advanced Search Results
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sureshchandra Balchand Jain
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-25-1989
Criminal
Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj Vyapar Viniyan Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 5, 5(2) and 16; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 240 and 241; Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 - Rules 27 and 29
1990CriLJ2554
D.D. Vyas, Govt. Adv.
S.D. Jha, J.1. Appellant State of M.P. through this appeal challenges the acquittal of the respondent accused (hereinafter called 'Accused') of charges under Rule 29 of M.P. Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Rules')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Krushnakant Shantilal Pandya and ors.
Gujarat
Oct-29-1996
Criminal
(1997)3GLR2094
A.N. Divecha, J.1. The judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate of Court No. 9 at Ahmedabad on 18th October 1991 in Criminal Case No. 3176 of 1989 is under challenge in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilipbhai Chhaganlal Patel Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-24-1982
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23 (2) and 24
AIR1983Bom128; 1984(2)BomCR338
P.R. Vyas and;H.S. Patel, Advs.
ORDER1. The Respondent No. 2 Smt Bhaumati filed a petitioner under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for divorce. She also took out a notice of motion bearing No. 4551 of 1981 for interim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Balkishan Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur an ...
Rajasthan
Jul-21-1979
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 62(1), 64(1) and 64A; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1980Raj234
B.L. Maheshwari and; R.N. Munshi, Advs.
ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. The petitioner by this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to quash the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the STAT')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGandabhai Jinabhai Vs. Ramubhai Fakirbhai (by Lrs.)
Gujarat
Sep-09-1981
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 115; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 70, 85 and 85A
AIR1982Guj142; (1982)1GLR531
R.N. Shah, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner is the original plaintiff of Special Civil Suit No. 100 of 1977 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (S. D.). Surat. He gave application - Exh 40 by which he requested the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Mahamantri, P.W.D. and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-14-1995
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act - Sections 20 and 21
(1996)IIILLJ1174Raj; 1996(1)WLC177; 1995(1)WLN244
R.P. Vyas, Adv.
Arun Madan, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the panics. This writ petition, under Articles 226 & 221 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred by the petitioners against the impugned Auard passed In the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalkishan Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Aug-05-1980
Criminal
1980WLN(UC)415
M.B. Sharma, J.1. This is an application under Section 482 Gr. P.O. by the accused-appellant, praying that the order (sic)affi ming the conviction of the appellant recorded on 15-11-78 against the appellant by this Court (Sidhu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Representing Northern Railway Vs. Firm J.P. Sharm ...
Rajasthan
May-12-1967
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30
AIR1968Raj99
Magraj and; Lakhpat Raj, Adv.
Kan Singh, J.1. This is an appeal under section 39 of the Arbitration Act and is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Bikaner, dated 28-10-1963, whereby the learned Judge awarded a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHimatbhai Pethabhai Vankar Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Oct-01-1999
NarcoticsCriminal
(2000)2GLR829
P.M. Vyas and; Rekha H. Kapadia, Advs.
J. Calla, J.1. This Appeal as was sent to this Court through Jail is directed against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad on 26th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiraj Sahebji Mujawar Vs. Smt. Roshan Siraj Mujawar and Others
Mumbai
Apr-03-1989
Family
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1); Mulla's Mahomedan Law - Sections 370; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128; Constitution of India - Article 44
AIR1990Bom344
G.R. Rege, Adv.
ORDER1. This Civil Revision Application raises an interesting and a somewhat intricate issue. The parties are muslims governed by Mahomedan Law. The present application arises out of execution proceedings. Both decree and the appellate order in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »