Advanced Search Results
Sri.n.p.amrutesh Vs. The Union Of India
Karnataka
May-30-2023
Land Acquisition
Sri. V.R. Datar
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF MAY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION No.21879/2014 (GM-RES)-PIL BETWEEN: SRI.N.P.AMRUTESH,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGilles Pfeiffer Vs. Union of India and Others
Chennai
Mar-08-1996
Constitution
Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20 to 22 and 226; Auroville Foundation Act, 1980 - Sections 18 and 19
AIR1996Mad322
Sriram Panchu, Adv.
ORDER1. The prayer made in this writ petition is to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the order No. 1348/RRO/94-3441 dated 1-11-1995 issued by the third respondent.2. The petitioner states that he is a French...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Madras Port Trust, Represented by Its Chairman Vs. V. Ramalingam,
Chennai
Apr-08-2003
Service
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 43, Rule 1
(2003)2MLJ382
R.G. Rajan and ;Vijay Narayan, Advs.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Review Application No. 68 of 2001 in W.A. No. 1251 of 2000, which emanated from W.P. No. 11938 of 1993. The judgment will also cover C.M.P. No. 13438...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.V. Sathyanarayana Vs. Global Drugs Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Jul-22-1998
Company
(1999)95CompCas595
Mr. T. K. Bhaskar
1. This is a petition filed under Section 111 of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against Global Drugs Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the company") and two others being directors of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Nathmal, Vs. the District Collector
Chennai
Apr-17-2003
Commercial
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2003Mad252; (2003)2MLJ271
V.T. Gopalan, Senior Counsel for ;Ramakrishna Reddy and ;V. Ramesh, Advs.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of two batches of writ petitions. The first batch will cover the writ petitions, W.P. Nos. 16776, 16777, 16778, 16779, 20857 and 20858 of 2000. In all these writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFenoplast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jul-24-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(62)ECC730
Mr. Govind Das
1. These appeals involve a common issue and are, therefore, taken up together for disposal. The duty demand has been raised against the appellants consequent on the issue regarding classification of the appellant's goods being resolved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDredging Corpn. of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-30-2000
Customs
(2000)(72)ECC369
1. These appeals arise from Order-in-Original No. 3/97 dated 21.5.97 confirming duty demand of Rs. 5,44,65,058 under the provisions of Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant is a public section undertaking who had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishore J. Chawla Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Nov-11-1999
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 40, 107 and 108; Constitution of India - Article 21
1999(66)ECC594; 2000(117)ELT4(Mad)
Habibullah Basha, Sr. Adv.
ORDERK. Govindarajan, J.1. The petitioner has filed the above writ petitions, the first one for issue of a writ of mandamus, restraining the respondents from harassing the petitioners or using third degree methods against the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Chandra Sekharan Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-24-2000
Customs
(2001)(132)ELT751Tri(Chennai)
1. The Appellants M/s. Sujana Industries Ltd., entered into a contract with M/s. Techno Import and Export, Dubai under purchase order dated 13-6-1995 for supply of 1000 mtrs. of M.S. Sections @ US $ 1065/MT.Total CIF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsstt. Collector of Cus., Madras Vs. Sun Paper Mill Ltd.
Chennai
Jun-24-1997
Customs
1997(95)ELT187(Mad)
Shri V.T. Gopalan, ;Senior Central Govt. Standing Counsel for S. Udayakumar, Addl. CGSC
A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. The writ Appeal is directed against the order of Shivaraj Patil, J., dated 27-7-1995 in W.P. No. 4881 of 1985, allowing the said writ petition filed by the respondent herein and directing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »