Advanced Search Results
Time Masters Vs. Commr. of Customs (Exports)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-17-2000
Land Acquisition
(2000)(68)ECC650
Shri. V.N. Doiphode
1. The appellants entered for export wrist watches claiming benefit of the DEPB Scheme. The export goods were covered under AR-4A documents filed by the manufacturers. The containers had been sealed in the factory of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKerala Chemicals and Proteins Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-31-1989
MRTP
(1989)(24)ECC76
Shri. A.N. Haksar
1. The only point which arises for our consideration in the instant appeal is - "Whether the di-calcium phosphate manufactured and cleared by the appellants was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 55/75 as amended...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaresh A. Shah and ors. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-07-1999
Service Tax
(1999)(85)LC302Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These three applications arise out of the same common order and are therefore dealt with in this single order.2. The facts as narrated in the proceedings are as below. Shri MD Ganatra, one of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner of Central Vs. Akay Cosmetics (P) Limited
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-06-2004
Excise
(2004)(167)ELT253Tri(Bang.)
1. This is an appeal filed by Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No.78/2000-CE Dated 27.03.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore.2. M/s. Akay Cosmetics (P) Limited were manufacturers of Instant Hair Colour sold under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›